Sunday, 8 November 2015

CHURCH HISTORY Part 2 -:- [How Did The Reformation Start]


CHURCH HISTORY Part 2 -:- [How Did The Reformation Start]

Published 20151109 -:- Revised 20250829

NB: I am dyslexic so please bear with me. Bible references are from MKJV unless noted otherwise.


AIM ---  The aim of this talk is to give the listener some knowledge of church history during the lead up to the Reformation period.

REASON ---          The Reformation did not just start with Martin Luther! How Did The Reformation Start? Unless one can answer this question one has no justifiable reason for breaking away from the Church of Rome! So let’s find out the reasons.


REFERENCES & EQUIPMENT ---
MKJ=     Bible references are from the Modern King James Bible unless noted otherwise.
WH=      Classic Time line of World History by Sebastian Adam [based on Ussher’s ‘Annals of the World’] (9m wall chart)
HYY=     History Year by Year (by Dorling Kindersley Ltd)
GPF=      Great People of Faith and Wisdom (by Readers Digest)
HCC=     History of The Christian Church (by Philip Schaff) via e-Sword 1882 Edition
FBM=     Fox’s Book of Martyrs – via e-Sword
WP=     Wikipedia
CN=     e-Sword Commentary Notes by “NAME” on Bible Ref “BOOK CH: Vrs” e.g. [ref CN Clark on Dan 7:7].
EN=     Microsoft Encyclopaedia Encarta 2006. with reference word to be used, e.g. [ref EN i.e. Protestantism]
EB=     Encyclopædia Britannica 1999 Edition
NA=       New Advent. Catholic Encyclopaedia with reference word to be used, e.g. [ref NA i.e. Jesuits, The]
TV=     Television for Slide presentations.

DISCLAIMER -- Clearly I don’t want to upset anyone’s faith or beliefs. That’s why most of this work is made up of “quotations” from reputable articles you can source to verify. HCC is in old ‘1880’ English so direct quotes are somewhat hard to understand. To change it too much would make it harder to find the references. If a reference is underlined you can use that exact wording to find the original article.

REVISION   
I might at times make reference to prophecies. This is for the benefit of those who understand the historic viewpoint.

In the previous lesion I covered the following points:-

THE SPREAD OF THE GOSPEL
Legends with some factual evidence has it that the Apostles themselves took the gospel beyond the then know Roman world. The message travelled as far as, England, Ireland, Scotland, Germany and France in the northwest. And to Syria, Asia Minor and Russia to the north and the east. And to the south and east, Alexandria, Cairo, India and Ethiopians. By the 200’s the gospel was in north Sweden and China.

PERSECUTED
Christians were persecuted first by the Jews, then the Romans for nearly 280 years. Then in 313 The Roman Emperor Constantine became a Christian. He declared in an Edict granting tolerance to All Forms of worship, in effect legalizing Christianity. This period of time in church history was known as “The Church of Pergamos” she was “married to power”, the power of Rome, the beginning of “the falling away”.

By 367 WORSHIP OF MARY, MARTYRS AND SAINTS,  IDOLATRY AND RELICS
There was an immense array of these issues; they became part of the idolatrous false worship and an integral part of the Roman Church.

380 THE RISE OF PAPAL SUPREMACY
We covered how with the help of the Emperor the simple bishop of Rome started to elevate himself to the lofty title of Pontifex, the old title for the High Priest of pagan Rome. “Theodosius's edict …he referred to the western Bishop of Rome, Damasus I, as a pontifex,”

393 The Canon,
The Canon is the name we give to the 66 books that we call the bible, and how it was determined, and the Apocrypha; was it in or out?

THE FALL OF ROME
Rome was invaded some 7 times that we had covered, and these invading kingdoms were all Arian Christian. They all feared the Pope, “Pontifex Maximus” and would bow to papal power.

THE INCREASE IN PAPAL POWER
From 400 to 1000AD the church and the bishop of Rome (the pope) became more powerful. As prophesied by Daniel in ch.2: v40, the East and Western Roman Empire, (the two legs of iron), crumbled into ten kingdoms with the character of iron and clay, partly weak and partly strong. During this time the pope managed to pull political strings and destroy three Arian kingdoms. “Plucked up by the roots”

GOD’S USE OF ISLAM
In 612 Islam rose up “from the bottomless pit” took a third part of the Old Roman World, [Rev ch.9:15]. They created havoc destroying idols and Christian manuscripts, which temporarily cleansed the East Empire of idolatry. Then as prophesied after 150 years in 762 the Arabs moved their capital to Baghdad and settled into an uneasy peace with the Christian world. [Rev 9:5. “tormented 5 months”]

By 1073AD. Pope Gregory VII rose to the chair of Peter as the most powerful man in Europe with Emperors and Kings subject to him.

Q&A --- Are there any questions?

LESSON  --  CHURCH HISTORY Part 2

MORE FALSE TEACHING
The position of the Pope was greatly feared through out the world for centuries, and in some circles it still is today. The paragraph and eight articles listed below can be found in “e-Sword” [ref CN Barnes on Dan7:28]. Over centuries these articles became part of the catholic beliefs. In each article I have underlined key words that you can use to find more information in “History of The Christian Church”

“The Pope has claimed to be the head of the church, and has asserted and exercised the right of appointing sacred seasons; of abolishing ancient institutions; of introducing numberless new festival occasions, practically abrogating the laws of God on a great variety of subjects. We need only refer, in illustration of this,”
(a) to the claim of infallibility, by which an absolute jurisdiction is asserted that covers the whole ground; [ref HCC vol.7 ch.3:49]
(b) to all the laws pertaining to image-worship, so directly in the face of the laws of God; [ref HCC vol.4 ch.10:103]
(c) to the celibacy of the clergy, rendering void one of the laws of heaven in relation to marriage; [ref HCC vol.2 ch.9:107]
(d) to the whole doctrine respecting purgatory; [ref “St. Augustin and Pope Gregory I” [ref HCC vol.2 ch.12:156]
(e) to the doctrine of transubstantiation; [ref “sanctioned under Pope Innocent III. in 1215.” [ref HCC vol.4 ch11:130]
(f) to the practical abolition of the Christian Sabbath by appointing numerous saints’ days to be observed as equally sacred; [HCC1-9:57]
(g) to the law withholding the cup from the laity - contrary to the commandment of the Saviour; and [ref HCC vol.3 ch.5:64]
(h) in general to the absolute control claimed by the Papacy over the whole subject of religion. [“care of all” ref HCC vol.5 ch.2:11]

For each of the above articles their earliest dates of record I can find are:- a=680, b=367, c=629, d=590, e=410, f=170, g=492, h=492

Q & A ------------

THE REFORMATION AND HOW IT STARTED
It was basically a matter of, “by their fruit you shall know them” (Mat 7:20), or by the lack of fruit you will know something is wrong!
From Pope Gregory the Great about 590 to nearly 1010AD “For nearly five hundred years heresy had been unknown in Western Europe”… “The Bible was not an altogether forgotten book. The people remembered it. Popular preachers like Bernard of Thiron, Robert of Abrissel and Vitalis of Savigny quoted its precepts and relied upon its authority. There was a hankering after the Gospel which the Church did not set forth. The people wanted to get behind the clergy and the ritual of the sacraments to Christ himself,” [ref HCC vol.5 ch.10:79]

“It was in the early years of the eleventh century, that the first reports of the appearance of heresy” occurred. From about the year 1010AD, independent groups rebelled all over Europe with their own systems of worship. [ref HCC vol.5 ch.10:80]

 “But their system extended its influence throughout the middle ages down to the thirteenth century, reappearing, under different modifications, with a large infusion of Christian elements, in the Priscillianists, Paulieians, Bogomiles, Albigenses, Catharists and other sects, which were therefore called “New Manichaeans.”” [ref HCC vol.2 ch.11:135]

THE REFORMERS OBJECTIONS
Their doctrines didn’t all agree. Some of their objections I have listed below. You can find most of them in; [ref HCC vol.5 ch.10:79 to 83]. I have underlined key words or statements so that you can find them via e-Sword in “History of The Christian Church”, or in a library.

Marriage they pronounced an unclean relationship.” “Oaths and even military service were renounced.
The worship of the cross and other images was regarded as idolatry.” …
Destroying crosses and denouncing tithes.” “doctrine, ritual, and the organization of the Church.” also
The sacerdotal theory of the priesthood.” (the belief that the priest has supernatural power and the only mediator between man and God)
The validity of infant baptism was also quite widely denied, and the Cathari abandoned water baptism altogether.”
They replaced it with “consolamentum”, “the laying on of hands and the” Gospel of John,..upon the head or breast of the candidate. The candidate made confession of all sins of thought, word, work, and vision, “placed his faith and hope in God”. “The kiss of peace followed.”

“The Bogomili ., rejected the eucharist, and substituted for baptism with water a ritual of prayer and the imposition of hands.”
Transubstantiation was denied..if Christ’s body had been as large as the largest mountain, it would have been consumed long before”.
“As for adoring the cross, thorns and spears might with equal propriety be worshipped, for Christ’s body was wounded by” them.
Special honor was given by the Cathari to the Gospel of John, and the Waldensian movement started with an attempt to make known the Scriptures through the vulgar tongue. The humbler classes knew enough about clerical abuses from their own observation;”
In their heresy trials:- “In the thousands of reports of judicial cases, which are preserved, charges of immoral conduct are rare.”

“There are two Churches, they held, one of the wicked and one of the righteous. They themselves constituted the Church of the righteous,” “Its fruits proved that the established Church was not the true Church. The true Church endures persecution, does not prescribe it.”
“One of the charges made against the established Church was that it countenanced war and marshalled armies.”
“The Roman Church sits in the place of rule and is clothed in purple and fine linen. The true Church teaches first.”
“The Roman Church baptizes first. The true Church has no dignitaries, prelates, cardinals, archdeacons, or monks.”
“The Roman Church is the woman of the Apocalypse, a harlot, and the pope anti-Christ.”

All this happened by about 1150AD , the west was rising from the Dark Ages. The elite had the opportunity to learn Latin, the language in which the Bible was written. The comments above regarding the Gospel of John etc., it would have been hand written, large and possibly the only book they had. “By the end of the twelfth century they were reported to have followers in nearly 1000 cities. The Dominican Rainerius gave 4,000,000 as a safe estimate of their number and declared this was according to a census made by the Cathari themselves.”
I didn’t say these Early Reformers had it all right! But they could work out from scripture what was wrong!!! [ref HCC vol.5 ch.10:80].

Q & A ------------                   10 min

THE PAPAL CLAIMS OF AUTHORITY
This is a very delicate issue! I’ve said I’ve no wish to upset anyone’s faith or beliefs, so I use quotations. For this I used the Roman Catholic Encyclopaedia, “New Advent” to verify the existence of the claims. The claims STILL exist! BUT it doesn’t matter what we believe now! But what the world believed when the claims were made? I have underlined key words for reference in “History of the Christian Church”

Lets say you can read your own language but not the Bible, which is in Latin. You have seen what happens to heretics! Is it worth it?

Consider; The peasant, most probably can’t read; only believe what you are told, “heresy is as witchcraft”, so superstition reigns supreme!
The merchant. You have a business and family to care for. The priest must be right, you paid him to get your mum out of purgatory?
The monk or cleric, sure you read Latin, but you learnt parrot fashion all services in Latin, and don’t want to loose your job or your life.
The Lords or the King, you receive your right to rule from the pope. “You don’t want to bite the hand that feeds you!”

We are jumping ahead in history a little bit, but I thought it would be best to cover these claims in one section. Keep these claims in mind as we cover the next few sections for the same period in history. Let’s now examine each of these claims with a “short comment on each?” 

607 “Pope Gregory condemned the titles of Universal Bishop..etc.. such pomposity was satanic or antichrist in nature. ..Pope Boniface III a mere three years after the death of Gregory, petitioned Emperor Phocus to declare the Roman See the head of all Christian churches.. the title Universal Bishop would apply exclusively to the Bishop of Rome.” [ref HCC vol.4 ch.4:51,53] “one of the popes must be wrong?”

858 Nicholas I "..superior papal authority and dominion is derived from the law of the Caesars." “...the appellation of God had been confirmed by Constantine on the Pope, who being God, cannot be judged by man."...“so the pope is God”

1054 Pope Leo IX sent a letter to Michael, Patriarch of Constantinople, in 1054, that cited a large portion of the Donation of Constantine, to include the phrase Vicarius Filii Dei..Leo provided the Greek Patriarch with the..text..to officially notify him that Emperor Constantine.. conferred a unique dignity, authority..on the See of Peter, making Constantinople subject to Rome. Leo IX assured the Patriarch that the donation was completely genuine…Little did Leo IX know that he cited and testified to the authenticity of the most stupendous fraud in European history. The Patriarch rejected the claims..and subsequently the Catholic Church was split in two in the Great Schism of 1054.

“All was based on a fraud? Vicarius Filii Dei can be found in hundreds of documents, and it opens a can of warms regarding 666”


1073 THE DICTATES OF HILDERBRAND (POPE GREGORY VII)  (1073-1085)
1. That the Roman Church was founded by the Lord alone....“The True Church was founded by the Lord”
2. That the Roman Pontiff alone is justly called universal...“Universal; a title for Christ see Weymouth NT Eph 1:22”
3. That he alone can depose bishops or restore them ...“so what, they should ALL be deposed”
9. That all princes should kiss the feet of the pope alone...“pompous”
12. That it is lawful for him to depose emperors ...“pompous”
18. That his sentence ought not to be reviewed by any one; and he alone can review [the decisions] of all...“pompous”
19. That he ought to be judged by no one...“Christ will judge him in the end”
22. That the Roman Church never erred; nor will it, according to Scripture, ever err...“In 607AD above proved otherwise”
27. That he can absolve subjects from their allegiance to unrighteous [rulers]....“that’s the only one got right so far?”

1198  Pope Innocent III. Claims Divine Authority ……it is "not only as a man, but as the true God's vice governor on earth" .. he "dissolves not with human, but with divine authority"...“We are ALL God’s vice governors.. In the Name of Jesus!”

1198 Pope Innocent III Claims Authority Over Kings…Just as the founder of the universe established two great lights in the firmament of heaven, the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night, so too He set two great dignities in the firmament of the universal church..., the greater one to rule the day, that is, souls, and the lesser to rule the night, that is, bodies. These dignities are the papal authority and the royal power.. just as the moon derives its light from the sun and is indeed lower than it in quantity and quality, in position and in power, so too the royal power derives the splendour of its dignity from the pontifical authority.. [ref HCC vol.5 ch.5:37] “WOW!”

1243 Innocent IV Every cleric must obey the Pope, even if he commands what is wrong, for no one can judge him. The only exception was if the command involved heresy or tended to the destruction of the church.   “So there is NO Right or Wrong, Do as your told!!”

1245 Council of Lyons, Innocent IV vs Frederick. “we (The Pope) hold on earth the place of Jesus Christ,”[ref HCC vol.5 ch.6:44]“pass!!”

“Where Peter (or his successor) is, there is the Church." "There is No Allegiance to Christ Without Submission to the Pope").
[ref HCC vol.6 ch.10] [ ref HCC vol. 6 ch.1:8]...“Anti-Christ, Or In place of Christ!! Usurper!!

1320 The Decision of the Pope and the Decision of God Constitute One Decision.
Only the Pope is said to be the Vicar of God: because he alone is able to bind and loose, .. given to him by God. The decision of the Pope and the decision of God constitute one decision, ….. Therefore no one can appeal from the Pope to God, as no one can enter into the consistory of God without the mediation of the Pope, who is the key-bearer and the doorkeeper of the consistory of eternal life; and as no one can appeal to himself, so no one can appeal from the Pope to God, because there is one decision and one court of God, and the Pope.
[Augustinus Triumphus (1243-1328) Summa…ecclesiastica (Summary On The Power Of The Church) Internet] [ref HCC vol.6 ch.10]
“Numerous titles of Christ here are claimed by the pope, Also NOBODY knows the mind of God, Down right Blasphemy!!!”

1417 The Roman Pontiff, successor of the blessed Peter, and the vicar of Jesus Christ, keeper of the keys of the heavenly Kingdom, of all regions of the world, and of all of the nations and those who dwell in them,..(4 April 1417).[ref HCC vol.5 ch.2:11]  “Same as above!”

NOW I am NOT out to malign the pope! This is just a sample. Go to the Library or Google “Papal Claims to Authority” or “Concerning the extent of Papal dignity, authority, or dominion and infallibility” or “Vicarius Filii Dei 666”.

Now you know the bible, so what are your thoughts?   Q & A ------   25 min

REFORMERS FROM WITHIN (these are pre 1440, people before the invention of the printing press)

Reform generally came from with in the church. Clergyman, who understood scriptures and spoke out. Others remained loyal to the pope because they would loose their comfortable lifestyle or worse. I would like to mention some of these “loyal” reformers here and the teachings they brought forth. It will help us understand how various “Orders” within the Church of Rome developed.

Hildegard of Bingen Germany (1098-1179). She suffered a condition akin to severe migraines and other debilitating illnesses. During these events she received visions and prophecies that gained her even the popes respect. In her later years she delivered some damming prophecies demanding church reform, which they took note of and corrected. She predicted: 1- The murder of Thomas Becket, 2- The overthrow of the German King Frederick I, 3- the European revolutions against the church. (Rev 17:16  “ten horns..shall hate the whore..burn her with fire”) [ref GPF page 207]. She urged the church to self-purify, “bade men look for salvation not to priests but to Christ.” [ref HCC vol.5 ch.8:67]

Dominic of Guzman Spain (1170-1221). His Order, received papal sanction 1216. This and the Franciscan Order “were the Salvation Army of the thirteenth century, and continue to be powerful organizations to this day” [ref HCC vol.5 ch.8:68] With poverty as their base even the layman could join. They could endure hardship and where at the grass roots level with the people in the markets and on the battlefields.

Francis of Assisi Italy (1181-1226). He turned the church routine of that day on its head. He took Jesus at his word when He sent out his disciples saying “Preach.. The kingdom of heaven…freely ye have received, freely give. Provide neither gold, silver, brass nor scrip for your journey, neither two coats, neither shoes, nor yet staves: Behold, I send you forth as sheep in the midst of wolves”  (Mat 10 7-16). With this he started the Franciscan Order, received papal sanction in 1223. His principles were poverty and living by faith alone. [ref GPF page 221]

Q & A ------------

HELP WAS COMING
It is very sad that millions of genuinely earnest Christians blindly followed the Catholic principles. But help to correct the false teaching was on its way. And guess where from? As in the last talk the help came from Islam. But God had to gave them another push!!

The Arab Muslims--  “Under Hakim, 1010, a fierce persecution broke out against the Christian residents of Palestine and the pilgrims.” Persecution subsided but soon after the Pope, “Sergius IV.,. 1012, suggested the idea of an armed expedition against the Mohammedans who had “defiled Jerusalem and destroyed the church of the Holy Sepulchre.”” [ref HCC vol.5 ch.7:48] and [ref HCC vol.5 ch.7:49] 

RISE OF THE TURKS

About 1062AD Tughrit Beg leading the Seljuks (later know as the Turks) occupied Baghdad and ended the Buwayhid dynasty. In 1063 his successor Alp Arsian expanded Seljuk dominion into Anatolia Armenia and Syria. By 1071 the Turks crushed the Byzantine army and held the Eastern Emperor Romanus IV ransom. By 1077 they had taken Syria and Jerusalem. [ref HYY page 128] 

THE CRUSADES

“Gregory VII., appealed to by Michael VII. of Constantinople, had, in two encyclicals, 1074, urged the cause upon all Christians, and summoned them to go to the rescue of the Byzantine capital.”..“The call which resulted in the first expedition for the recovery of Jerusalem was made by Pope Urban II. at the Council of Clermont, 1095. Its chief popular advocate was Peter the Hermit.” [ref HCC vol.5 ch.7:49]

 “There were seven greater Crusades, the first beginning in 1095, the last terminating with the death of St. Louis, 1270. Between these dates and after 1270 there were other minor expeditions, and of these not the least worthy of attention were the tragic Crusades of the children.”
Absolution, indulgences and eternal life were commonly offered to those who went to fight. “God, said the abbot Guibert, chronicler of the First Crusade, invented the Crusades as a new way for the laity to atone for their sins, and to merit salvation.” [ref HCC vol.5 ch.7:48]

 “Even during the confusion of the crusades and the disasters which overtook the empire, the love for learning continued; and when Constantinople at last fell into the hands of the Turks, Greek scholarship took refuge in the West, kindled the renaissance, and became an important factor in the preparation for the Reformation.” [ref HCC vol.4 ch.13:136]

THE CRUSADES AGAINST ALBIBENSES

“The synod of Tours, 1163…forbid..Catholics from mingling with the Albigenses and from having commercial dealings with them..Princes ..instructed to imprison..and confiscate their goods. The Third Lateran, 1179, extended the punishments to the defenders of heretics and their friends. It gave permission..to reduce heretics to slavery and shortened..penance by two years for those taking up arms against them.” “In 1244,..Montségur was taken, the last refuge of the Albigenses. Two hundred of the Perfect were burned.” [ref HCC vol.5 ch.10:58-86]
If you see the Book of Revelation from the historic view, refer to Rev 13:17. “no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark”

THE FALL OF CONSTANTINOPLE
“1280 The first confirmed use of cannon in Europe was in southerern Iberia, by the Moors, in the Siege of Cordoba.” [ref WP “Cannon”]
The first definite use of artillery.. was against the Ottoman siege of Constantinople, in 1396, forcing the Ottomans to withdraw. They acquired their own cannon, and laid siege to the Byzantine capital again, in 1422, using "falcons", which were short but wide cannon. By 1453, the Ottomans used 68 Hungarian-made cannon for the 55-day bombardment of the walls of Constantinople, …The largest of their cannon was the Great Turkish Bombard, with a crew of 200 men, 70 oxen, and 10,000 men to transport it. [ref WP “Cannon”]
If you see the Book of Revelation from the historic view, this period in history is in Rev 9:13-21. “in their mouth, and in their tails”

Remember I said that God needed to give them a push. We can now see how God use the Turks to kindle the Reformation. The Greek manuscripts arriving in Europe would shed light on all the false teachings of the church. …The lord works in mysterious ways.

Q & A ------------                   40 min


KNOWELDGE SHALL INCREASE
Let us just imaging it is 1612AD and we are the Lord and Lady of “Boffiny in West Somewhereia”, your pageboy says “The gift from the King has arrived sire!” It be an exquisitely bound volume entitled “Almanac of Literary Progress And Works of The 200 Years Bygone”. The King has mass-produced them, using His latest wonder, “The Moveable Letter Printing Machine” and every Lord received one!

1380 “Wiclif, the first translator of the whole Bible into English (1380)” [ref HCC vol.4 ch.2:13]
1440 “Germany invention” … “the art of printing, about 1440,” [ref HCC vol.7 ch.2:16] [ref HCC vol.6 intro:1]
1453  The fall of Constantinople “Flight of Greek scholars to Western Europe.” [ref HCC vol.4 ch.13:136] see above notes.
1455 “The first printed Latin Bible,..two volumes,..before 1455 and bears the name of the Gutenberg Bible” [ref HCC vol.6 ch.9:77]
1458 “Greek,…, had its first teachers in Gregory Tifernas, who reached Paris, 1458,” [ref HCC vol.6 ch.8:70]
1477  England’s first printing press. “Caxton had setup his printing-press at Westminster in 1477.” [ref HCC vol.6 ch.9:77]
1478  A copy of the Gutenberg Bible in Spanish [ref HCC vol.7 ch.9:77]

1478 The Spanish Inquisition (see notes below)

1516 “Erasmus … his Greek New Testament, 1516,”  [ref HCC vol.6 ch.9:77]
1520  (or just before) A copy of the Gutenberg Bible in Italian, Bohehian, and Russian [ref HCC vol.7 ch.9:77]
1525 “Zwingli completes the entire translation five years before Luther” NT 1525, both by 1531, in Swiss-German [ref WP “Zürich Bible”]
1526 “Tyndale…first printed English New Testament did not appear till 1526” [ref HCC vol.6 ch.9:77]
1526   Also a Swedish Bible. [ref My Red Book]
1529 “Luther New Testament The Oldest Printed German N.T. Scripture” [ref WP]
1535 “Robert Olivetan, Calvin’s cousin,..first edition..French translation of the Bible at Neuchâtel in 1535”[ref HCC vol.8ch.7:60]
1535   Complete English Bible “Coverdale, who translated the Bible in 1535,” [ref CN Barnes “Coverdale”]
1537 “The Matthew Bible, or Matthew's Version, published 1537 by John Rogers, under the pseudonym "Thomas Matthew"” [ref WP]
1537  Also a Danish Bible. [ref My Red Book]
1539 “The Great Bible was the first authorized edition of the Bible in English, authorized by King Henry VIII of England to be read aloud in the church services of the Church of England. … the publication was completed in London in April 1539.” [ref WP “Great Bible”]
1611 “The King James Version (KJV), commonly known as the Authorized Version (AV) or King James Bible (KJB), is an English translation of the Christian Bible for the Church of England begun in 1604 and completed in 1611.” [ref WP]

With the aid of the printing press in 1440, it took only 17 years (1520-37) to have the bible printed in every major language of Europe.

Q & A ------------

THE SPANISH INQUISITION
Any one can see the obvious effect that the arrival of Greek manuscripts and the introduction of the printing press had on the world. There was no going back. The Pope had to do some thing to stop it, if he wanted to maintain his control over the world. So he introduced the Spanish Inquisition. See the above list of dates; those bibles were being produce under the penalty of fire, torture and death!
I heard a funny but true story that happened in 1525. Tyndale was in Antwerp producing Bibles in English and shipping them to England. The Bishop of London visiting Antwerp heard of this and declared, “how that he would gladly buy the New Testaments. Packington hearing him say so,” and informed the Bishop that he could perches all he could find for the Bishop. To which the Bishop replied, “get them for me, and I will pay whatsoever they cost; for I intend to burn and destroy them all" But Packington and Tyndale were mates, so they put together all the bibles they could produce, with a reasonable mark up. So the “bishop of London had the books, Packington had the thanks, and Tyndale had the money.” There after Tyndale had enough money to produce three times the number of bibles. [ref FBM ch. 12]

1478 The Spanish “Inquisition was instituted with the express sanction of Pope Sixtus IV. (Nov. 1, 1478), was controlled by the Dominican order and by Cardinals, and as to the benefit, the peace of the grave-yard is worse than war.” It existed for about 350 years. “The Spanish Inquisition pronounced its last sentence of death in the year 1781, was abolished under the French rule of Joseph Napoleon, Dec. 4, 1808, restored by Ferdinand VII. 1814, again abolished 1820, and (after another attempt to restore it) in 1834.” [ref HCC vol.4 ch.6:80]

 “The torture was abolished in England after 1640, in Prussia 1740, in Tuscany 1786, in France 1789, in Russia 1801, in various German states partly earlier, partly later (between 1740 and 1831), in Japan 1873…Exceptional cases of judicial torture occurred in the nineteenth century in Naples, Palermo, Roumania (1868), and Zug (1869)” [ref HCC vol.4 ch.6:80]

 “It has been estimated that the victims of the Spanish Inquisition outnumber those of heathen Rome, and that more Protestants were executed by the Spaniards in a single reign, and in a single province of Holland, than Christians in the Roman Empire during the first three centuries.” [ref HCC vol.7 ch.6:100]

If you take the Crusades against Albibenses in 1163 as the start of the percicutions, to Japan in 1873 as the end, that is over 700 years!
No one can even “guesstimate” the number that died during this time. They were burnt, died in prison or butchered in large massacres. Just a simple bit of maths for you, this is talking about the Cathari, “in France know the as the Albigenses”. Remember the 4,000,000 Cathari …
“the papal Inquisition, which had been so effective in exterminating the Albigenses” [ref HCC vol.6 ch.7:58]. ALL wiped out!! Other persecutions by the Pope were against the Hussites, Waldensian Huguenots and others. If you wish to look into the Spanish Inquisition, may I suggest you use “e-Sword”, search “Fox’s Book of Martyrs” and “The History of The Christian Church”. And there are numerous other books available. I have heard figures as high as 100 to 150 million Christians died at the hands of the Pope worldwide during those 700 yrs. One example of the hatred the papists had towards the truth was:- At Tyndale’s execution at Vilvorde, 1536  “the priest..rebuked Tyndale for proposing to translate the Bible in the words, “We were better without God’s laws than the pope’s.”” [ref HCC vol.6 ch.9:77]

Q & A ------------                  50 min

THE REFORMATION
"The title, Reformers before the Reformation, has been aptly given to a group of men of the 14th and 15th centuries who anticipated many of the teachings of Luther and the Protestant Reformers. They stand, each by himself, in solitary prominence, Wyclif in England, John Huss in Bohemia, Savonarola in Florence, and Wessel, Goch and Wesel in Northern Germany…They differ,..the moral reformer, Savonarola, from the group of the German mystics, who sought a purification of life in quiet ways,..They also differ from the group of ecclesiastical reformers, D’Ailly, Gerson, Nicolas of Clamanges, who concerned themselves with the fabric of the canon law …Wyclif and his successors were doctrinal reformers… John Wyclif, called the Morning Star of the Reformation,” …[ref HCC vol.6 ch.5:40]

But there is just over 500 years from the New Manichaeans in 1010 to Luther in 1517. What happened during that 500 years?

We can liken the reformation to “a giant caldron of soup”. The reformers were the ingredients; the heat was the papal power. 1010AD First in go the New Manichaeans, 1163 the papal crusades against the Albigenses and others. 1198-1245 papal claims of authority. Lets add More to the pot, 1380 Wiclif, 1440 printing press, 1458 learning Greek. So the pope puts the lid down hard in 1478 with The Spanish Inquisition.
“Then the pope really turned the heat UP!”
“St. Peter’s Dome ..the glory and the shame of papal Rome ..built ..from the sale of indulgences ..broke up the unity ..Christendom ..begun in 1506 under Pope Julius II..completed..1626 ..cost ..46,000,000 scudi, ..annual expense 30,000 scudi (dollars).” [ref HCC vol.7 ch.3:30]

QUESTION – Do any of you have any experience with a pressure cooker and a blocked relief valve?? 
BANG!!
1517
The reformation theoretically has a starting date as, 31 October 1517, when “Luther posted the ninety-five theses, which he had composed in Latin, on the door of the Castle Church of Wittenberg,” [ref internet, WP]. “Jesus began his public ministry with the expulsion of the profane traffickers from the court of the temple. The Reformation began with a protest against the traffic in indulgences which profaned and degraded the Christian religion.” [ref HCC vol.7 ch.3:30]. Luther’s ninety-five theses were predominately just an attack on indulgences. The key difference with Luther is that his teachings and his bible in German, was the essence that galvanized the German princes together to stand up to the pope and the Emperor. More into the pot 1525-37 bibles printed in all major languages. “Bang went the Pot altogether!”

 “The Reformation began simultaneously in Germany and Switzerland, and swept with astonishing rapidity over France, Holland, Scandinavia, Bohemia, Hungary, England and Scotland; since the seventeenth century it has spread by emigration to North America, and by commercial and missionary enterprises to every Dutch and English colony, and every heathen land. It carried away the majority of the Teutonic and a part of the Latin nations, and for a while threatened to overthrow the papal church.” [ref HCC vol.7 ch.1:2]

But towards the close of the sixteenth century the triumphant march of the Reformation was suddenly arrested. Romanism rose like a wounded giant, and made the most vigorous efforts to reconquer the lost territory in Europe, and to extend its dominion in Asia and South America. Since that time the numerical relation of the two churches has undergone little change. But the progress of secular and ecclesiastical history has run chiefly in Protestant channels.
In many respects the Roman Church of to-day is a great improvement upon the Mediaeval Church. She has been much benefited by the Protestant Reformation, and is far less corrupt and far more prosperous in Protestant than in Papal countries”. [ref HCC vol.7 ch.1:2]
Q & A ------------ 

THE COUNTER-REFORMATION
The Church of Roman - “She was driven to a counter-reform which abolished some of the most crying abuses and infused new life and zeal into her clergy and laity. No papal schism has disgraced her history since the sixteenth century. No pope of the character of Alexander VI. or even Leo X. could be elected any more. She lives chiefly of the past, but uses for her defence all the weapons of modern warfare.”..“she attracts intelligent and cultured minds; while the common people are kept in ignorance and in superstitious awe”.. “Thus the two branches of Western Christendom seem to hold each other in check, and ought to stimulate each other to a noble rivalry” [ref HCC vol.7 ch.1:2]

The ‘New Advent’ gives the catholic view as: - “The term Counter-Reformation denotes the period of Catholic revival from the pontificate of Pope Pius IV in 1560 to the close of the Thirty Years' War, 1648. The name, though long in use among Protestant historians, has only recently been introduced into Catholic handbooks. The consequence is that it already has a meaning and an application, for which a word with a different nuance should perhaps have been chosen. For in the first place the name suggests that the Catholic movement came after the Protestant; whereas in truth the reform originally began in the Catholic Church, and Luther was a Catholic Reformer before he became a Protestant. [ref NA Counter-Reformation]

Remember I said in “REFORMERS FROM WITHIN”, Reform generally came from with in the church. But the fact is that Rome still vigorously worked hard to stop ANY reform, as shown by the Inquisition.

CONCLUSION

At this period in time, the early 1500’s, we now leave the western world on the brink of religious wars. The Roman Church fighting to hold control. She has the Inquisition and the use of armies from loyal Kings and Emperors. The Protestant Church had the light of the gospel and the sword of the Lord to use to fight for their very existence, and to rapidly convert whole provinces and Kingdoms for the Lord. 

We have covered only 500 years in this lesion, but you can see how the Reformation brought the religious world to the boil. So I will just go out and bring the urn to the boil and we can relax, have a cuppa and chat. And I will be happy to answer any questions.

In my next talk I hope to cover ‘The Historic Interpretation’ and why it is importance to understand! Also talk about most of the well-known Reformers, dates, events and some of their beliefs. Then in later talks we can study each of the Reformers in detail.


Thank you very much for attending.                              65 min

No comments:

Post a Comment