20210708

The Sunday Worship Question

A Jew shipwrecked Fri, sleep ALL Sat. Wake Sun, think it's Sat, worship from then on. Do's he go to Hell for worship the wrong day??

The Sunday Worship Question

Published 20210708 -:- Revised 20251014P

I am dyslexic so please bear with me. Scripture references are from Modern King James (MKJV) unless noted other wise.


Abbreviations, References & Equipment

CN        -Commentary Notes via e-Sword. By “NAME” on Bible Ref “BOOK CH: Vrs” e.g. [Ref CN Clark on Dan 7:7].
e-Sword    -The FREE Bible on line. e-Sword downloads
HCC        -History of The Christian Church (by Philip Schaff) 1882 Edition, via e-Sword. [Phrases underlined for easy reference.]

NB: Quotations from old references might be in ‘Ye old English’. They might be somewhat unfamiliar phraseology! But by quoting them verbatim you can use various underlined phrases from the commentaries to search for the references yourself.


Introduction

I listen to a web-cast hosted by a very dear friend, but I have this ‘hiccup’ with some aspects of his preaching. I find these points hard to agree with. And I hope I’ve got his stance correct, he claims the following points: -

  1. Sunday is not the correct day for Christian worship it should be Saturday.
  2. Sunday worship was instigated in 313 by Constantine or some time later by the pope.

These issues also crop up with other denominations such as the Seventh Day Adventists. So I would like to put something together for you to hopefully answer these questions.


Aim

What I would like to do with this is:

Firstly, give you a copy of the scriptures, from various bibles available through e-Sword, that speak of the, “the Lord’s Day”, “the first day of the week” and the “eighth day”, just to see if there is anything of interest.

Secondly, just look through all the commentary notes found in e-Sword that speak on those two points above.

Also if you find anything that is incorrect, please, by all means send me an email, or drop a comment below. I look forward to hearing from you; let's start: -

 

The Lord’s Day

From the ERV (Easy-to-Read Version)

Eze 30:3 “That day is near! Yes, the LORD'S day for judging is near. It will be a cloudy day, the time for judging the nations.

Zep 1:7 “Be silent before the Lord GOD, because the LORD'S day for judging the people is coming soon. The LORD has prepared his sacrifice, and he has told his invited guests to get ready.

Zep 1:8 “The Lord said, "On the LORD'S day of sacrifice, I will punish the king's sons and other leaders. I will punish all the people wearing clothes from other countries.

Rev 1:10 “On the LORD'S day, the Spirit took control of me. I heard a loud voice behind me that sounded like a trumpet.

From the GW (Gods Word Version)

Lev 23:3 “You may work for six days. But the seventh day is a day of worship, a day when you don't work, a holy assembly. Don't do any work. It is the LORD'S day of worship wherever you live.

Rev 1:10 “I came under the Spirit's power on the LORD'S day. I heard a loud voice behind me like a trumpet,

N.B. most versions have this verse in Revelation 1:10

 

First Day Of The Week MKJV

Search for the phrase, “first day of the week”

Joh 20:19 “Then the same day at evening, being the first day of the week, when the doors were shut where the disciples were assembled for fear of the Jews, came Jesus and stood in the midst, and saith unto them, Peace be unto you.

Act 20:7 “And upon the first day of the week, when the disciples came together to break bread, Paul preached unto them, ready to depart on the morrow; and continued his speech until midnight.

1Co 16:2 “Upon the first day of the week let every one of you lay by him in store, as God hath prospered him, that there be no gatherings when I come.

Others Are

Mat 28:1 “In the end of the sabbath, as it began to dawn toward the first day of the week, came Mary Magdalene and the other Mary to see the sepulchre.

Mar 16:2 “And very early in the morning the first day of the week, they came unto the sepulchre at the rising of the sun.

Mar 16:9 “Now when Jesus was risen early the first day of the week, he appeared first to Mary Magdalene, out of whom he had cast seven devils.

Luk 24:1 “Now upon the first day of the week, very early in the morning, they came unto the sepulchre, bringing the spices which they had prepared, and certain others with them.

Joh 20:1 “The first day of the week cometh Mary Magdalene early, when it was yet dark, unto the sepulchre, and seeth the stone taken away from the sepulchre.

 

The Eighth Day KJV

Exo 22:30 “Likewise shalt thou do with thine oxen, and with thy sheep: seven days it shall be with his dam; on the eighth day thou shalt give it me.

Lev 9:1 “And it came to pass on the eighth day, that Moses called Aaron and his sons, and the elders of Israel;

Lev 12:3 “And in the eighth day the flesh of his foreskin shall be circumcised.

Lev 14:10 “And on the eighth day he shall take two he lambs without blemish, and one ewe lamb of the first year without blemish, and three tenth deals of fine flour for a meat offering, mingled with oil, and one log of oil.

Lev 14:23 “And he shall bring them on the eighth day for his cleansing unto the priest, unto the door of the tabernacle of the congregation, before the LORD.

Lev 15:14 “And on the eighth day he shall take to him two turtledoves, or two young pigeons, and come before the LORD unto the door of the tabernacle of the congregation, and give them unto the priest:

Lev 15:29 “And on the eighth day she shall take unto her two turtles, or two young pigeons, and bring them unto the priest, to the door of the tabernacle of the congregation.

Lev 22:27 “When a bullock, or a sheep, or a goat, is brought forth, then it shall be seven days under the dam; and from the eighth day and thenceforth it shall be accepted for an offering made by fire unto the LORD.

Lev 23:36 “Seven days ye shall offer an offering made by fire unto the LORD: on the eighth day shall be an holy convocation unto you; and ye shall offer an offering made by fire unto the LORD: it is a solemn assembly; and ye shall do no servile work therein.

Lev 23:39 “Also in the fifteenth day of the seventh month, when ye have gathered in the fruit of the land, ye shall keep a feast unto the LORD seven days: on the first day shall be a sabbath, and on the eighth day shall be a sabbath.

Num 6:10 “And on the eighth day he shall bring two turtles, or two young pigeons, to the priest, to the door of the tabernacle of the congregation:

Num 7:54 “On the eighth day offered Gamaliel the son of Pedahzur, prince of the children of Manasseh:

Num 29:35 “On the eighth day ye shall have a solemn assembly: ye shall do no servile work therein:

1Ki 8:66 “On the eighth day he sent the people away: and they blessed the king, and went unto their tents joyful and glad of heart for all the goodness that the LORD had done for David his servant, and for Israel his people.

2Ch 7:9 “And in the eighth day they made a solemn assembly: for they kept the dedication of the altar seven days, and the feast seven days.

2Ch 29:17 “Now they began on the first day of the first month to sanctify, and on the eighth day of the month came they to the porch of the LORD: so they sanctified the house of the LORD in eight days; and in the sixteenth day of the first month they made an end.

Neh 8:18 “Also day by day, from the first day unto the last day, he read in the book of the law of God. And they kept the feast seven days; and on the eighth day was a solemn assembly, according unto the manner.

Eze 43:27 “And when these days are expired, it shall be, that upon the eighth day, and so forward, the priests shall make your burnt offerings upon the altar, and your peace offerings; and I will accept you, saith the Lord GOD.

Luk 1:59 “And it came to pass, that on the eighth day they came to circumcise the child; and they called him Zacharias, after the name of his father.

Act 7:8 “And he gave him the covenant of circumcision: and so Abraham begat Isaac, and circumcised him the eighth day; and Isaac begat Jacob; and Jacob begat the twelve patriarchs.

Php 3:5 “Circumcised the eighth day, of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, an Hebrew of the Hebrews; as touching the law, a Pharisee;

 

From The Commentary Notes:

Searching two separate words, ‘Sunday’ & ‘worship’ was too laborious. So changed to phrase, “Sunday worship”.

Refer CN by Joseph Benson on John 20:26
After eight days — That is, eight days after his resurrection, namely, the next Sunday; again his disciples were within — Were in a private room, as they were before; and Thomas with them — For though he had been absent once, yet he would not be absent a second time. When we have lost one opportunity of receiving good, we should give the more earnest heed to lay hold on the next. Then came Jesus, the doors being shut, as before, and stood in the midst — And they all knew him; for he showed himself now just as he had shown himself before. Our Lord deferred this his second appearance for some time, 1st, To show his disciples that he was not risen to such a life as he had formerly lived, to converse daily and hourly with them, but was as one that belonged to another world, and visited this only as angels do, now and then, when there was occasion. Where Christ was during these eight days, and the rest of the time of his abode on earth, would be folly to inquire, and presumption to determine. Wherever he was, no doubt angels ministered unto him. 2d. He deferred it so long as seven days for three reasons:

1st, That he might put a rebuke on Thomas for his incredulity, and perhaps also for his negligence. He had not attended the former meeting of the disciples, and to teach him to prize those seasons of grace better for the future, he shall not have such another opportunity for several days. A very melancholy week we have reason to think he had of it; drooping and in suspense, while the other disciples were full of joy: and the cause was in himself: it was his own folly and unbelief.

2d, That he might try the faith and patience of the rest of the disciples. They had gained a great point when they were satisfied that they had seen the Lord; then were the disciples glad; but he would try whether they could keep the ground they had gained when they saw no more of him for seven days. And thus he would gradually wean them from his bodily presence, which they had doted and depended too much upon.

3d, That he might put an honour upon the first day of the week, and give a plain intimation of his will, that it should be observed in his church as the Christian sabbath, that is, the weekly day of holy rest and holy convocations. That one day in seven should be religiously observed, was an appointment from the beginning; as old as innocence; and that, in the kingdom of the Messiah, the first day in the week should be that solemn day, Christ’s meeting his disciples in a religious assembly once and again on that day was indication sufficient. Add to this, it is highly probable, that in his former appearance to them he had ordered them to come together again that day seven-night, and had promised to meet them, and also that he appeared to them every first day of the week, (besides at some other times,) during forty days. And the religious observance of that day has been from thence transmitted down to us through every age of the church. This therefore is the day which the Lord has made sacred, and appointed for his peculiar worship and service. On this occasion also Christ said, Peace be unto you — Thus saluting them all in a friendly and affectionate manner, as he had done before. And this was no vain repetition, but significant of the abundant and assured peace which he gives, and of the continuance of his blessings upon his people, for they fail not, but are new every morning, new every meeting.


Refer CN by  Joseph Benson on 1 Corinthians 16:2-4
Upon the first day of the week — So κατα μιαν σαββατων here signifies, the Hebrews using the numeral for the ordinal numbers, as Gen 1:5, The evening and the morning were one day; that is, the first day; and also using the word sabbath to denote the week, as Luk 18:12. I fast twice, του σαββατου, in the week. So Mar 16:2, πρωι της μιας σαββατων, early the first day of the week. Let every one of you lay by him in store, &c. — Not the rich only: let him also that hath little gladly give of that little, as God hath prospered him — Increasing his alms as God increases his substance. According to this lowest rule of Christian prudence, if a man, when he has or gains one pound, give a tenth to God, when he has or gains ten pounds, he will give a tenth to God; when he has or gains a hundred, he will give the tenth of this also. “And yet,” says Mr. Wesley, “I show unto you a more excellent way. He that hath ears to hear let him hear: Stint yourself to no proportion at all; but lend to God all you can.” That there be no gatherings — No necessity of making any particular collections; when I come — From these last words it is inferred that θησαυριζων, here rendered laying by him in store, signifies to put his charity into a common box; because, if they had kept it at home, there would have been need of gathering it when the apostle came. But the words εκαστος παρεαυτω τιθετω, let every one place it with himself, admit not of this sense; nor, when each of them had done this, could there be any necessity of making collections; or, as that expression imports, soliciting the charities of others, but only of receiving the contributions thus laid by for the use of the saints. We may observe here, that from the beginning, the Christians were wont to assemble on the first day of the week, called by them the Lord’s day, to perform their religious worship. “This day being the Lord’s day,” saith Dionysius, bishop of Corinth, “we keep it holy.” “On Sunday,” saith Justin, “all Christians in the city or country meet together, because that is the day of our Lord’s resurrection; and then we read the writings of the prophets and apostles. This being done, the president makes an oration to the assembly, to exhort them to imitate and do the things they heard: then we all join in prayer, and after that we celebrate the Lord’s supper.” — See Whitby. And when 1 come — When I am arrived at Corinth; whomsoever ye shall approve by letters — Signed by the members of your church, or their representatives; them will I send to bring your liberality — Greek, την χαριν υμων; literally, your grace; that is, the fruit of your grace, or, your free gift, to Jerusalem, to be there distributed among the poor Christians. And if it be meet — If it be thought proper; that I also should go — Thither on this occasion; they shall go with me — That they may witness for me that no part of the money received has been withheld, but that the whole of it has been delivered with the greatest fidelity, to be employed solely for the purposes for which it was contributed.
Refer CN by  Biblical Illustrator on Genesis 2:2-3 (I think “Chance” is a misprint? Maybe should be “Change”)
III. THE CHANCE FROM SATURDAY TO SUNDAY. Here is a venerable, sacred institution—hallowed by the Creator’s own example in Eden, solemnly enjoined amid the thunders of Sinai, distinctly set apart as one of the chief signs that Israel was God’s chosen, covenanted people, majestically buttressed by loftiest promises in case of observance, and by direst threats in case of non-observance, freighted with the solemn weight of fifteen centuries of sacred associations and scrupulous observance—suddenly falling into disuse, and presently supplanted by another day, which to this year of grace has held its own amid the throes of eighteen centuries. How, then, will you account for this stupendous revolution? It is a fair question for the philosophical historian to ask. And the philosophical historian knows the answer. Jesus the Nazarene had been crucified. All through the seventh day or Hebrew Sabbath He had lain in Joseph’s tomb. In that tomb, amid solitude and darkness and grave-clothes, He had grappled in mortal duel with the king of death, and had thrown him, and shivered his sceptre. At the close of that awful Sabbath, as it began to dawn toward the first day of the week (

Mat 28:1), He had risen triumphant from the dead. And by and in the very fact of that triumphant rising, He had henceforth and for evermore emblazoned the first day of the week as His own royal, supernal day, even time’s first, true Sabbath.

IV. JESUS CHRIST HIMSELF IS OUR SABBATH, alike its origin, its meaning, and its end. In fact the final cause of the Sabbath is to sabbatize each day and make all life sacramental. And Jesus Christ being our true Sabbath, Jesus Christ is also our true rest-even the spirit’s ever lasting Eden. (G.D.Boardman.)

Refer CN by  Chuck Smith on Genesis 2:1-25
And God established with Israel a covenant that they should keep that Sabbath day through all their generations. Someone said, "Well when did the church start worshipping on Sunday?" And those of the church who still enjoy worshipping on Saturday try to blame Constantine for the change to Sunday worship. But there are indications; even in the book of Acts that they were gathering together on the first day of the week to break bread. Also in the letter to the Corinthians, Paul talks about when they gathered together on the first day of the week, to bring their offerings in so that there’ll be no collections taken while he was there. Tertulian, one of the early church fathers, who antedates the Constantine and the whole development under Constantine, said that there were many Christians in that day who felt that the only day, really in which they should take communion was the first day of the week because that was the day that marked the resurrection of Jesus Christ.

Also Refer CN by  Chuck Smith on Exodus 20:1-26

Also Refer CN by  Chuck Smith on Acts 20:1-38
It is interesting for me to note that it records that they had gathered together on the first day of the week to break bread. So often you will hear the Seventh Day Adventist or others such as Herbert W. Armstrong who believe in Sabbath day worship. You will hear them declare that worshipping on Sunday did not begin until Constantine and he was the one who introduced Sunday worship to the church. Not so. There seems to be indications that the Gentile church worshipped on Sunday, almost from the beginning. Here we find the Gentile church gathering together on Sunday, the first day of the week, to break bread. One of the early church fathers, Tertullian, said that in as much as Jesus rose on the first day of the week, they felt that was the only day really in which the church should break bread. I don’t go along with Tertullian, but it seems that as early as the time of Tertullian, which was before Constantine, that the first day of the week was already a common practice in the gathering of the church.

Also Refer CN by  Chuck Smith on Romans 14:1-23
Now, on what day are we to worship the Lord? On Saturday or on Sunday? If we worship on Saturday, are we then to follow the Jewish custom of the day begins at sundown and should we began worshipping God on Friday evening as the sun goes down and worship until Saturday evening sundown? Or is Sunday the day that we should worship the Lord? There are those who are very vehement in their feeling that Saturday is the only day to worship the Lord, and if you worship the Lord on Sunday that is paramount to taking the mark of the beast, for Sunday worship is the mark of the beast because Sunday was actually named after the sun god-Sunday. And thus, it was after the sun god. Thus, we ought to worship on Saturday, but they don’t tell you that is named after the god Saturn.

From HCC; History of The Christian Church (by Philip Schaff) 1882 Edition, via e-Sword.
Vol. 2, Ch. 05, § 059-065 …. Chapter V. Christian Worship
§ 60. The Lord’s Day
See Lit. in vol. I.
The celebration of the Lord’s Day in memory of the resurrection of Christ dates undoubtedly from the apostolic age. Nothing short of apostolic precedent can account for the universal religious observance in the churches of the second century. There is no dissenting voice. This custom is confirmed by the testimonies of the earliest post-apostolic writers, as Barnabas, Ignatius, and Justin Martyr. It is also confirmed by the younger Pliny. The Didache calls the first day “the Lord’s Day of the Lord.”

Considering that the church was struggling into existence, and that a large number of Christians were slaves of heathen masters, we cannot expect an unbroken regularity of worship and a universal cessation of labor on Sunday until the civil government in the time of Constantine came to the help of the church and legalized (and in part even enforced) the observance of the Lord’s Day. This may be the reason why the religious observance of it was not expressly enjoined by Christ and the apostles; as for similar reasons there is no prohibition of polygamy and slavery by the letter of the New Testament, although its spirit condemns these abuses, and led to their abolition. We may go further and say that coercive Sunday laws are against the genius and spirit of the Christian religion which appeals to the free will of man, and uses only moral means for its ends. A Christian government may and ought to protect the Christian Sabbath against open desecration, but its positive observance by attending public worship, must be left to the conscientious conviction of individuals. Religion cannot be forced by law. It looses its value when it ceases to be voluntary.

§ 62. The Paschal Controversies
The history of the controversy divides itself into three acts.
1. The difference came into discussion first on a visit of Polycarp, bishop of Smyrna, to Anicetus, bishop of Rome, between a.d. 150 and 155. It was not settled; yet the two bishops parted in peace, after the latter had charged his venerable guest to celebrate the holy communion in his church. We have a brief, but interesting account of this dispute by Irenaeus, a pupil of Polycarp, which is as follows:

“When the blessed Polycarp sojourned at Rome in the days of Anicetus, and they had some little difference of opinion likewise with regard to other points, they forthwith came to a peaceable understanding on this head [the observance of Easter], having no love for mutual disputes. For neither could Anicetus persuade Polycarp not to observe inasmuch as he [Pol.] had always observed with John, the disciple of our Lord, and the other apostles, with whom he had associated; nor did Polycarp persuade Anicetus to observe (τηρεῖν) who said that he was bound to maintain the custom of the presbyters (= bishops) before him. These things being so, they communed together; and in the church Anicetus yielded to Polycarp, out of respect no doubt, the celebration of the eucharist (τὴν εὐχαριστίαν), and they separated from each other in peace, all the church being at peace, both those that observed and those that did not observe [the fourteenth of Nisan], maintaining peace.”

This letter proves that the Christians of the days of Polycarp knew how to keep the unity of the Spirit without uniformity of rites and ceremonies. “The very difference in our fasting,” says Irenaeus in the same letter, “establishes the unanimity in our faith.”

§ 63. Pentecost
Easter was followed by the festival of Pentecost. It rested on the Jewish feast of harvest. It was universally observed, as early as the second century, in commemoration of the appearances and heavenly exaltation of the risen Lord, and had throughout a joyous character. It lasted through fifty days — Quinquagesima — which were celebrated as a continuous Sunday, by daily communion, the standing posture in prayer, and the absence of all fasting. Tertullian says that all the festivals of the heathen put together will not make up the one Pentecost of the Christians. During that period the Acts of the Apostles were read in the public service (and are read to this day in the Greek church).

Subsequently the celebration was limited to the fortieth day as the feast of the Ascension, and the fiftieth day, or Pentecost proper (Whitsunday) as the feast of the outpouring of the Holy Spirit and the birthday of the Christian Church. In this restricted sense Pentecost closed the cycle of our Lord’s festivals (the semestre Domini), among which it held the third place (after Easter and Christmas). It was also a favorite time for baptism, especially the vigil of the festival.

§ 65. The Order of Public Worship
The earliest description of the Christian worship is given us by a heathen, the younger Pliny, a.d. 109, in his well-known letter to Trajan, which embodies the result of his judicial investigations in Bithynia. According to this, the Christians assembled on an appointed day (Sunday) at sunrise, sang responsively a song to Christ as to God, and then pledged themselves by an oath (sacramentum) not to do any evil work, to commit no theft, robbery, nor adultery, not to break their word, nor sacrifice property intrusted to them. Afterwards (at evening) they assembled again, to eat ordinary and innocent food (the agape).

This account of a Roman official then bears witness to the primitive observance of Sunday, the separation of the love-feast from the morning worship (with the communion), and the worship of Christ as God in song.

Justin Martyr, at the close of his larger Apology, describes the public worship more particularly, as it was conducted about the year 140. After giving a full account of baptism and the holy Supper, to which we shall refer again, he continues:

“On Sunday a meeting of all, who live in the cities and villages, is held, and a section from the Memoirs of the Apostles (the Gospels) and the writings of the Prophets (the Old Testament) is read, as long as the time permits. When the reader has finished, the president, in a discourse, gives all exhortation to the imitation of these noble things. After this we all rise in common prayer. At the close of the prayer, as we have before described, bread and wine with water are brought. The president offers prayer and thanks for them, according to the power given him, and the congregation responds the Amen. Then the consecrated elements are distributed to each one, and partaken, and are carried by the deacons to the houses of the absent. The wealthy and the willing then give contributions according to their free will, and this collection is deposited with the president, who therewith supplies orphans and widows, poor and needy, prisoners and strangers, and takes care of all who are in want. We assemble in common on Sunday because this is the first day, on which God created the world and the light, and because Jesus Christ our Saviour on the same day rose from the dead and appeared to his disciples.”

Here, reading of the Scriptures, preaching (and that as an episcopal function), prayer, and communion, plainly appear as the regular parts of the Sunday worship; all descending, no doubt, from the apostolic age. Song is not expressly mentioned here, but elsewhere. The communion is not yet clearly separated from the other parts of worship. But this was done towards the end of the second century.

The same parts of worship are mentioned in different places by Tertullian.
The eighth book of the Apostolical Constitutions contains already an elaborate service with sundry liturgical prayers.

Vol. 2, Ch. 05, § 68. Celebration of the Eucharist
The celebration of the Eucharist or holy communion with appropriate prayers of the faithful was the culmination of Christian worship. Justin Martyr gives us the following description, which still bespeaks the primitive simplicity: “After the prayers [of the catechumen worship] we greet one another with the brotherly kiss. Then bread and a cup with water and wine are handed to the president (bishop) of the brethren. He receives them, and offers praise, glory, and thanks to the Father of all, through the name of the Son and the Holy Spirit, for these his gifts. When he has ended the prayers and thanksgiving, the whole congregation responds: ‘Amen.’ For ‘Amen’ in the Hebrew tongue means: ‘Be it so.’ Upon this the deacons, as we call them, give to each of those present some of the blessed bread, and of the wine mingled with water, and carry it to the absent in their dwellings. This food is called with us the

eucharist, of which none can partake, but the believing and baptized, who live according to the commands of Christ. For we use these not as common bread and common drink; but like as Jesus Christ our Redeemer was made flesh through the word of God, and took upon him flesh and blood for our redemption; so we are taught, that the nourishment blessed by the word of prayer, by which our flesh and blood are nourished by transformation (assimilation), is the flesh and blood of the incarnate Jesus.” Then he relates the institution from the Gospels, and mentions the customary collections for the poor.

We are not warranted in carrying back to this period the full liturgical service, which we find prevailing with striking uniformity in essentials, though with many variations in minor points, in all quarters of the church in the Nicene age. A certain simplicity and freedom characterized the period before us. Even the so-called Clementine liturgy, in the eighth book of the pseudo-Apostolical Constitutions, was probably not composed and written out in this form before the fourth century. There is no trace of written liturgies during the Diocletian persecution. But the germs (late from the second century. The oldest eucharistic prayers have recently come to light in the Didache,which contains three thanksgivings, for the cup, the broken bread, and for all mercies. (chs. 9 and 10.) From scattered statements of the ante-Nicene fathers we may gather the following view of the eucharistic service as it may have stood in the middle of the third century, if not earlier.

The communion was a regular and the most solemn part of the Sunday worship; or it was the worship of God in the stricter sense, in which none but full members of the church could engage. In many places and by many Christians it was celebrated even daily, after apostolic precedent, and according to the very common mystical interpretation of the fourth petition of the Lord’s prayer. The service began, after the dismission of the catechumens, with the kiss of peace, given by the men to men, and by the women to women, in token of mutual recognition as members of one redeemed family in the midst of a heartless and loveless world. It was based upon apostolic precedent, and is characteristic of the childlike simplicity, and love and joy of the early Christians. The service proper consisted of two principal acts: the oblation, or presenting of the offerings of the congregation by the deacons for the ordinance itself, and for the benefit of the clergy and the poor; and the communion, or partaking of the consecrated elements. In the oblation the congregation at the same time presented itself as a living thank-offering; as in the communion it appropriated anew in faith the sacrifice of Christ, and united itself anew with its Head. Both acts were accompanied and consecrated by prayer and songs of praise.


The Lord’s Day
[Ref CN by Albert Barnes on Revelation 1:10
On the Lord’s day - The word rendered here as “Lord’s” (κυριακῇ kuriakē), occurs only in this place and in 1Co 11:20, where it is applied to the Lord’s supper. It properly means “pertaining to the Lord”; and, so far as this word is concerned, it might mean a day “pertaining to the Lord,” in any sense, or for any reason; either because he claimed it as his own, and had set it apart for his own service, or because it was designed to commemorate some important event pertaining to him, or because it was observed in honor of him. It is clear:
(1) That this refers to some day which was distinguished from all other days of the week, and which would be sufficiently designated by the use of this term.
(2) That it was a day which was for some reason regarded as especially a day of the Lord, or especially devoted to him.
(3) It would further appear that this was a day particularly devoted to the Lord Jesus; for:
(a) That is the natural meaning of the word “Lord” as used in the New Testament (compare the notes on Act 1:24); and
(b) If the Jewish Sabbath were intended to be designated, the word “Sabbath” would have been used.

The term was used generally by the early Christians to denote the first day of the week. It occurs twice in the Epistle of Ignatius to the Magnesians (about 101 a.d.), who calls the Lord’s day “the queen and prince of all days.” Chrysostom (on Ps. 119) says, “It was called the Lord’s day because the Lord rose from the dead on that day.” Later fathers make a marked distinction between the “Sabbath” and the “Lord’s day”; meaning by the former the Jewish “Sabbath,” or the seventh day of the week, and by the latter the first day of the week, kept holy by Christians. So Theodoret (Fab. Haeret. ii. 1), speaking of the Ebionites, says, “They keep the Sabbath according to the Jewish law, and sanctify the Lord’s day in like manner as we do” (Prof. Stuart). The strong probability is, that the name was given to this day in honor of the Lord Jesus, and because he rose on that day from the dead. No one can doubt that it was an appellation given to the first day of the week; and the passage, therefore, proves:

(1) That that day was thus early distinguished in some special manner, so that the mere mention of it would be sufficient to identify it in the minds of those to whom the apostle wrote;
(2) That it was in some sense regarded as devoted to the Lord Jesus, or was designed in some way to commemorate what he had done; and,
(3) That if this book were written by the apostle John, the observance of that day has the apostolic sanction. He had manifestly, in accordance with a prevailing custom, set apart this day in honor of the Lord Jesus. Though alone, he was engaged on that day in acts of devotion. Though far away from the sanctuary, he enjoyed what all Christians hope to enjoy on such a day of rest, and what not a few do in fact enjoy in its observance. We may remark, in view of this statement:

(a) that when away from the sanctuary, and deprived of its privileges, we should nevertheless not fail to observe the Christian Sabbath. If on a bed of sickness, if in a land of strangers, if on the deep, if in a foreign clime, if on a lonely island, as John was, where we have none of the advantages of public worship, we should yet honor the Sabbath. We should worship God alone, if we have none to unite with us; we should show to those around us, if we are with strangers, by our dress and our conversation, by a serious and devent manner, by abstinence from labor, and by a resting from travel, that we devoutly regard this day as set apart for God.

(b) We may expect, in such circumstances, and with such a devout observance of the day, that God will meet with us and bless us. It was on a lonely island, far away from the sanctuary and from the society of Christian friends, that the Saviour met “the beloved disciple,” and we may trust it will be so with us. For on such a desert island, in a lonely forest, on the deep, or amid strangers in a foreign land, he can as easily meet us as in the sanctuary where we have been accustomed to worship, and when surrounded by all the privileges of a Christian land. No man, at home or abroad, among friends or strangers, enjoying the privileges of the sanctuary, or deprived of those privileges, ever kept the Christian Sabbath in a devout manner without profit to his own soul; and, when deprived of the privileges of public worship, the visitations of the Saviour to the soul may be more than a compensation for all our privations. Who would not be willing to be banished to a lonely island like Patmos, if he might enjoy such a glorious vision of the Redeemer as John was favored with there?

[Ref CN by Joseph Benson on Revelation 1:10-11
On the Lord’s day — On this our Lord rose from the dead. On this the ancients believed he would come to judgment. It was therefore with the utmost propriety that St. John on this day both saw and described his coming.

[Ref CN from Cambridge Bible Revelation 1:10
the Lord’s day] Undoubtedly here used (though for the first time) in the sense now traditional throughout Christendom. Many of the early Fathers, Ignatius, Justin Martyr, Clement of Alexandria, Tertullian, &c. use the word of the First Day of the week. A few commentators have proposed to translate, “I was, in spirit, on the day of the Lord,” i.e. was carried away in spirit to the Great Day of the Lord’s Coming; but the reference to Rev 4:2 refutes this.

[Ref CN by Adam Clarke on Revelation 1:10
The Lord’s day - The first day of the week, observed as the Christian Sabbath, because on it Jesus Christ rose from the dead; therefore it was called the Lord’s day, and has taken place of the Jewish Sabbath throughout the Christian world.

[Ref CN from Geneva on Revelation 1:10
I was in the (h) Spirit on the (i) Lord's day, and heard behind me a great voice, as of a trumpet,
(h) This is a holy trance expressed…….
He calls it the Lord's day, which Paul calls the first day of the week; (1Co 16:2).

[Ref CN by John Gill on Revelation 1:10
I was in the Spirit on the Lord's day,.... Not on the Jewish sabbath, which was now abolished, nor was that ever called the Lord's day, and had John meant that, he would have said on the sabbath day; much less the Jewish passover, but the first day of the week is designed; so the Ethiopic version renders it "on the first day"; and is so called just as the ordinance of the supper is called the Lord's supper, being instituted by the Lord, and the Lord's table, 1Co 10:21, and that because it was the day in which our Lord rose from the dead, Mar 16:9; and in which he appeared at different times to his disciples, Joh 20:19, and which the primitive churches set apart for his worship and service, and on which they met together to hear the word, and attend on ordinances, Act 20:7; and Justin Martyr (z) tells us, who lived within about fifty years after this time, that on the day called τη του ηλιου ημερα, "Sunday", (by the Greeks,) the Christians met together in one place, and read the Scriptures, and prayed together, and administered the ordinance of the supper; and this, he adds, was the first day in which God created the World, and our Saviour Jesus Christ rose from the dead; yea, Barnabas (a), the companion of the Apostle Paul, calls this day the eighth day, in distinction from the seventh day sabbath of the Jews, and which he says is the beginning of another world; and therefore we keep the eighth day, adds he, joyfully, in which Jesus rose from the dead, and being manifested, ascended unto heaven: and this day was known by the ancients by the name of "the Lord's day"; as by Ignatius (b), Irenaeus (c), Tertullian (d), Origen (e), and others; for it must be some day that was known by this name, otherwise it is mentioned to no purpose, because it would not be distinctive from others; for which reason it cannot merely design the day in which John saw this vision, because the Lord appeared on it to him, for this would not distinguish it from any other day. Some have conjectured that this was not the weekly Lord's day observed by the Christians, but the anniversary of Christ's resurrection; and so the Ethiopians still call Easter "Schambatah Crostos", the sabbath of Christ: to understand it of the former is best. Now, though John was driven from the house and worship of God, and could not join with the saints in the public worship of that day; yet he was employed in spiritual contemplations and exercises, and was under a more than ordinary influence of the Spirit of God; and his spirit or soul was wholly intent upon, and taken up with divine and spiritual things, with visions and representations that were made unto his mind, which he perceived in his spirit, and not with the organs of his body; he was in an ecstasy of spirit, and knew not scarcely whether he was in the body or out of it:

[Ref CN from Jamieson-Fausset-Brown on Revelation 1:10
on the Lord’s day — Though forcibly detained from Church communion with the brethren in the sanctuary on the Lord’s day, the weekly commemoration of the resurrection, John was holding spiritual communion with them. This is the earliest mention of the term,the Lord’s day.” But the consecration of the day to worship, almsgiving, and the Lord’s Supper, is implied in Act 20:7; 1Co 16:2; compare Joh 20:19-26. The name corresponds to “the Lord’s Supper,” 1Co 11:20. Ignatius seems to allude to “the Lord’s day” [Epistle to the Magnesians, 9], and Irenaeus [Quaest ad Orthod., 115] (in Justin Martyr). Justin Martyr [Apology, 2.98], etc., “On Sunday we all hold our joint meeting; for the first day is that on which God, having removed darkness and chaos, made the world, and Jesus Christ our Savior rose from the dead. On the day before Saturday they crucified Him; and on the day after Saturday, which is Sunday, having appeared to His apostles and disciples, He taught these things.” To the Lord’s day Pliny doubtless refers [Epistles, Book X., p. 97], “The Christians on a fixed day before dawn meet and sing a hymn to Christ as God,” etc. Tertullian [The Chaplet, 3], “On the Lord’s day we deem it wrong to fast.” Melito, bishop of Sardis (second century), wrote a book on the Lord’s day [Eusebius 4.26]. Also, Dionysius of Corinth, in Eusebius [Ecclesiastical History, 4.23, 8]. Clement of Alexandria [Miscellanies, 5. and 7.12]; Origen [Against Celsus, 8. 22]. The theory that the day of Christ’s second coming is meant, is untenable. “The day of the Lord” is different in the Greek from “the Lord’s (an adjective) day,” which latter in the ancient Church always designates our Sunday, though it is not impossible that the two shall coincide (at least in some parts of the earth), whence a tradition is mentioned in Jerome [Commentary on Matthew, 25], that the Lord’s coming was expected especially on the Paschal Lord’s day. The visions of the Apocalypse, the seals, trumpets, and vials, etc., are grouped in sevens, and naturally begin on the first day of the seven, the birthday of the Church, whose future they set forth [Wordsworth].

[Ref CN by B.W. Johnson on Revelation 1:9-11
On the Lord's day. The day of the Lord's Resurrection, the first day of the week. In the earlier apostolic writings the day was called "the first day of the week," but by the close of the century it began to be called "the Lord's day," as here. Epistles of Barnabas, Ignatius and Dionysius, written near this time, so style it, and the name is of common occurrence from this time onward, and is confined to Sunday. It is not confounded with the "Sabbath day" of many centuries. See Dr. Wm. Smith's Unabridged Dictionary of the Bible, article "Lord's Day."
 
[Ref CN from Robertson Word Picture on Revelation 1:10
On the Lord’s Day (en tēi kuriakēi hēmerāi). Deissmann has proven (Bible Studies, p. 217f.; Light, etc., p. 357ff.) from inscriptions and papyri that the word kuriakos was in common use for the sense “imperial” as imperial finance and imperial treasury and from papyri and ostraca that hēmera Sebastē (Augustus Day) was the first day of each month, Emperor’s Day on which money payments were made (cf. 1Co 16:1.). It was easy, therefore, for the Christians to take this term, already in use, and apply it to the first day of the week in honour of the Lord Jesus Christ’s resurrection on that day (Didache 14, Ignatius Magn. 9). In the N.T. the word occurs only here and 1Co 11:20 (kuriakon deipnon the Lord's Supper). It has no reference to hēmera kuriou (the day of judgment, 2Pe 3:10).

[Ref CN from Pulpit Commentary on Revelation 1:1-20
On the Lord’s day. The expression occurs here only in the New Testament, and beyond all reasonable doubt it means "on Sunday." This is, therefore, the earliest use of the phrase in this sense. That it means Easter Day or Pentecost is baseless conjecture. The phrase had not yet become common in A.D. 57, as is shown from St. Paul writing, "on the first of the week" (1Co 16:2), the usual expression in the Gospels and Acts. But from Ignatius onwards, we have a complete chain of evidence that ἡ Κυριακή became the regular Christian name for the first day of the week; and Κυριακή is still the name of Sunday in the Levant. "No longer observing sabbaths, but fashioning their lives after the Lord’s day" (Ign., ’Magn.,’ 9.). Melito, Bishop of Sardis, wrote a treatise περί Κυριακῆς (Eusebius, ’Hist. Eccl.,’ IV. 26:2). Dionysius of Corinth, in an epistle to the Romans, mentions that the Church of Corinth is that day keeping the Lord’s holy day (Eusebius, ’Hist. Eccl.,’ IV. 23.11). Comp. also Clem. Alex., ’Strom.,’ VII. 12.98; Tertull., ’De Con.,’ 3. and ’De Idol.,’ 14., where Dominicus dies is obviously a translation of Κυριακὴ ἡμέρα; and fragment 7 of the lost works of Irenaeus. That "the Lord’s day" (ἡ Κυριακὴ ἡμέρα) in this place is the same as "the day of the Lord" (ἡ ἡμέρα τοῦ Κυίου) is not at all probable. The context is quite against any such meaning as that St. John is spiritually transported to the day of judgment. Contrast Rev 6:17; Rev 16:14; 1Jn 4:17; Joh 6:39, Joh 6:40, Joh 6:44, Joh 6:54; Joh 11:24; Joh 12:48. Whereas, seeing that the visions which follow are grouped in sevens (the seven candlesticks, seven seals, seven trumpets, seven vials), the fact that they begin on the first day of the seven is eminently appropriate.

[Ref CN from Popular New Testament on Revelation 1:9
On the Lord’s day. Certainly not the last day, the great day of judgment, known in the New Testament by a different expression, ‘the day of the Lord,’ and before which, not on which, the events of the Apocalypse take place, but the first day of the week (comp. the expression used by St. Paul, ‘the Lord’s Supper,’ in 1Co 11:20). Yet the words are not to be regarded as a simple designation of the first day of the week in its distinction from the others. The nature and character of the day are to be kept particularly in view. It is the day of the ‘Lord,’ the risen and glorified Lord, the day of Him who, thus risen and glorified, had founded that Church against which no enemies shall prevail. Wrapt therefore in contemplation of the glory of this Lord; not simply with the peaceful influences of the day of rest diffused over his soul, but dwelling amidst the thoughts of that authority and power which are possessed by the risen Jesus at the right hand of the Father, St. John receives the revelation which is here communicated to him.

[Ref CN from MHCC Revelation 1:9-11
It was the apostle's comfort that he did not suffer as an evil-doer, but for the testimony of Jesus, for bearing witness to Christ as the Immanuel, the Saviour; and the Spirit of glory and of God rested upon this persecuted apostle. The day and time when he had this vision was the Lord's day, the Christian sabbath, the first day of the week, observed in remembrance of the resurrection of Christ. Let us who call him “Our Lord,” honour him on his own day. The name shows how this sacred day should be observed; the Lord's day should be wholly devoted to the Lord, and none of its hours employed in a sensual, worldly manner, or in amusements. He was in a serious, heavenly, spiritual frame, under the gracious influences of the Spirit of God. Those who would enjoy communion with God on the Lord's day, must seek to draw their thoughts and affections from earthly things. And if believers are kept on the Lord's holy day, from public ordinances and the communion of saints, by necessity and not by choice, they may look for comfort in meditation and secret duties, from the influences of the Spirit; and by hearing the voice and contemplating the glory of their beloved Saviour, from whose gracious words and power no confinement or outward circumstances can separate them. An alarm was given as with the sound of the trumpet, and then the apostle heard the voice of Christ.
 
[Ref CN by Alexander MacLaren on Revelation 1:9-20
In his rocky solitude the Apostle was ‘in the Spirit,’ -by which is, of course, not meant the condition in which every Christian should ever be, but such a state of elevated consciousness and communion as Paul was in when he was caught up to the heavens. No doubt John had been meditating on the unforgotten events of that long-past day of resurrection, which he was observing in his islet by solitary worship, as he had often observed it with his brethren in Ephesus; and his devout thoughts made him the more capable of supernatural communications. Whether the name of the first day of the week as ‘the Lord’s Day’ originated with this passage, or had already become common, is uncertain. But, at all events, it was plainly regarded as the day for Christian worship. Solitary souls, far away from the gatherings of Christ’s people, may still draw near to Him; and if they turn thought and love towards Him, they will be lifted above this gross earth, and bear that great voice speaking to them, which rose above the dash of waves, and thrilled the inward ear of the lonely exile. That voice, penetrating and clear like a trumpet, gave him his charge, and woke his expectation of visions to follow.
 
[Ref CN by John Wesley on Revelation 1:10
On this our Lord rose from the dead: on this the ancients believed he will come to judgment. It was, therefore, with the utmost propriety that St. John on this day both saw and described his coming. 

[Ref CN from Vincent's Word Studies on Revelation 1:10
On the Lord's day (ἐν κυριακῇ ἡμέρᾳThe phrase occurs only here in the New Testament. The first day of the week, the festival of the Lord's resurrection. Not, as some, the day of judgment, which in the New Testament is expressed by ἡ ἡμέρα τοῦ Κυρίου the day of the Lord (2Th 2:2); or ἡμέρα Κυρίου the day of the Lord, the article being omitted (2Pe 3:10); or ἡμέρα Χριστοῦ the day of Christ (Php 2:16). The usual New Testament expression for the first day of the week is ἡ μία τῶν σαββάτων (Luk 24:1; see on Act 20:7).

[Ref CN from Sermon Bible on Revelation 1:10

The Lord’s Day.

I. What is the meaning of the expression, "the Lord’s Day"? Does it mean the day of judgment, and is St. John saying that in an ecstacy he beheld the last judgment of God? Undoubtedly "the day of the Lord" is an expression often applied to the day of judgment in the Old and New Testaments, but such a meaning would not serve St. John’s purpose here; he is plainly giving the date of his great vision, not the scene to which it introduced him, and just as he says that it took place in the isle of Patmos, thus marking the place, so he says that it was on the Lord’s Day, thus marking the time. Does the phrase, then, mean the annual feast of our Lord’s resurrection from the dead—our Easter Day? That day, as we know from the Epistle to the Corinthians, we are to keep "not with old leaven, neither with the leaven of malice and wickedness, but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth"; but it could hardly have served for a date, because in those days, as some time afterwards, there were different opinions in the Church as to the day on which properly the festival should be kept. If the Lord’s Day had meant Easter Day, it would not have settled the date of the revelation without some further specification. Does the phrase, then, mean the Sabbath day of the Mosaic law? If St. John had meant the Sabbath, the seventh day of the week, he would certainly have used the word "Sabbath"; he would not have used another word which the Christian Church, from the day of: he Apostles downwards, has applied, not to the seventh day of the week, but to the first. There is indeed no real reason for doubting that by the Lord’s Day St. John meant the first day of the week, or, as we should say, Sunday. Our Lord Jesus Christ has made that day in a special sense His own by rising on it from the dead and by connecting it with His first six appearances after His resurrection.

II. What are the principles which are recognised in the observance of the "Lord’s Day" by the Church of Christ? (1) The first principle embodied is the duty of consecrating a certain portion of time, at least one-seventh, to the service of God. This principle is common to the Jewish Sabbath and to the Christian Lord’s Day. And such a consecration implies two things: it implies a separation of the thing or person consecrated from all others and a communication to it or him of a quality of holiness or purity which was not possessed before. (2) A second principle in the Lord’s Day is the periodical suspension of human toil. This also is common to the Jewish Sabbath and the Christian Lord’s Day. The Jewish Sabbath and the Christian Lord’s Day, while agreeing in affirming two principles, differ in two noteworthy respects: (1) they differ in being kept on distinct days; (2) in the reason or motive for observing them. The Christian motive for observing the Lord’s Day is the resurrection of Christ from the dead; that truth is to the Christian creed what the creation of the world out of nothing is to the Jewish creed; it is the fundamental truth on which all else that is distinctively Christian rests, and it is just as much put forward by the Christian Apostles as is the creation of all things out of nothing by the Jewish creed. (3) A third principle is the necessity of the public worship of God. The cessation of ordinary work is not enjoined upon Christians only that they may while away the time or spend it in self-pleasing or in something worse. The Lord’s Day is the day of days, on which Jesus our Lord has a first claim. In the Church of Jesus the first duty of the Christian is to seek to hold converse with the risen Lord.

H. P. Liddon, From the Christian World Pulpit.

Christianity would seem to have altered the law of the Sabbath precisely where we might have expected it might be altered—in those parts which were of positive, not of moral, obligation. Our Saviour, who, being the coeternal Son of God, is Lord also of the Sabbath day, modified the mode in which it is to be hallowed partly by relaxing the literal strictness of the precept, "Thou shalt do no manner of work," and permitting works of necessity and of mercy, but principally by removing the false glosses with which superstition and human traditions had disfigured the true meaning of the commandment.

I. Even if the Decalogue or the Fourth Commandment were abrogated by the Gospel, and the Lord’s Day were but a Christian ordinance sanctioned by our Lord, either immediately by His own presence and approval, or mediately by His Apostles acting under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, we should still be bound to keep it in the same way as if it were the Sabbath transferred from the old dispensation to the new, if, at least, the early Christians may be admitted as witnesses of the meaning of what on this supposition was their own ordinance. With them the first day of the week was not a day of unnecessary work or a day of amusement, but a holy day, set apart from the rest for special public worship and cheerful thanksgiving. So much, indeed, might be inferred from the very name, "the Lord’s Day." Chrysostom, Augustine, and others warned Christians against the example of the Jews of their days who made the Sabbath a time for dancing, banqueting, and luxurious self-indulgence. The truth is, Christians held the first day of the week to be the Lord’s Day, and kept it as such, not with idle scrupulosity, but with honesty of purpose. Accordingly any work, however laborious, if necessary or compulsory, they would have done with a quiet conscience; but unnecessary work they would have felt a sin. A slave unable to obtain his freedom would have done his master’s bidding unhesitatingly and cheerfully; a free man would not have followed his worldly calling on the Lord’s Day. Amusements would have been felt more discordant with the Lord’s Day than work. They were not necessary; they could not be compulsory; they had nothing to do with the special service of God for which that day was hallowed. They were, therefore, simply wrong. "It is commanded you," writes St. Augustine, "to observe the Sabbath spiritually, not as the Jews observe theirs, in carnal ease—for they wish to have leisure for their trifles and their luxuries—for a Jew would be better employed in doing something useful in his field than in sitting turbulently in the theatre."

II. It is a matter of little practical moment, then, the obligation on which our observance of the Sunday rests. Whether it is the primal Sabbath, re-enacted on Sinai and continued in the Christian code with modifications in its positive and non-essential details, or whether it is the Christian ordinance of the Lord’s Day to be understood and interpreted by the practice of the early Christians, it is undoubtedly a day set apart and holy to the Lord. It is His special portion of our time, dedicated to Him for His glory and for our good. Its peculiar duties are public worship, religious meditation and instruction, and the celebration of the Lord’s Supper in remembrance of Christ. Its spirit is a calm and collected mind, undisturbed by worldly cares and unexcited by worldly amusements, in tune with holy thoughts and the exercises of religion, and open to all the cheerful influences of home and family affection, and charity, and benevolence.

III. With this general principle before us, (1) we must be very slow to judge and very cautious to condemn others for their manner of observing the Lord’s Day. They have the same rule with us; they are to apply it by the aid of their own conscience. To their own Master they stand or fall. (2) But though indulgent in our judgment of others, we must not be too indulgent of ourselves. Scruples and nice distinctions, indeed, austerity and gloom, the obedience of the letter, not of the spirit, are alien, it has been said, to the true character of the Christian Lord’s Day; and he who is free from such scruples and doubts, as he is always the happiest, will often be the holiest man. A healthy faith and a devout heart will usually discern by a kind of spiritual instinct what may and what may not be done. But the important practical rule for all of us is this: "Let every one be fully persuaded in his own mind." (3) We must be careful not to impose needless labour on others, and should help and encourage them, as well as we may, to enjoy rest on the day of rest. "If thou turn away thy foot from the Sabbath, from doing thy pleasure on My holy day, and call the Sabbath a delight, holy of the Lord, honourable, and shalt honour Him, not doing thine own ways, nor finding thine own pleasure, nor speaking thine own words, then shalt thou delight thyself in the Lord; and I will cause thee to ride upon the high places of the earth, and feed thee with the heritage of Jacob thy father; for the mouth of the Lord hath spoken it."

J. Jackson, Penny Pulpit, New Series, No. 627.

References: Rev 1:10.—Homiletic Quarterly, vol. ii., p. 267. Rev 1:10-20.—Expositor, 1st series, vol. ii., p. 115. Rev 1:12-17.—Spurgeon, Sermons, vol. vii., No. 357.


Conclusion:
I have always believed that Saturday is the true Sabbath, but I also see Sunday as a special day to worship the Lord. I can now see why Paul said in Romans 14:5 “One indeed esteems a day above another day; and another esteems every day alike. Let each one be fully assured in his own mind”.

 

Hear are a few of my other talks: -

When Did Jesus Become The Messiah
This question when answered will shed considerable light on Daniel’s 70 weeks prophecy. An in depth study of Daniel's Seventy Weeks prophecy of Daniel chapter 9. Showing why the whole prophecy should have been concluded by about 38A.D.

Stanley and The Blood Covenant
A short story of what Stanley went through cutting a blood covenant so that he could explore darkest Africa in search of Dr Livingston. Then looking at the comparison with your covenant with Jesus Christ.

The ‘Futurist Interpretation’ Automobile
This is meant to be a good laugh!

****************************************************************************************************************************************

Hope you found that of interest

GBY (God Bless Ya!)

Yours Adrian

****************************************************************************************************************************************

 

20210703

FROM "The Second Advent - How: When: Where?" Daniel Chapter 11

A RECAP Of A 1940 Booklet, By A.J. Ferris, His Expounding on the Past 2000 Years of The Middle East’s Rise and Fall of the Arabs and Turks:-

FROM The Second Advent - How: When: Where? Daniel Chapter 11 

By A. J. Ferris

Published 202300703 -:- Revised 20251215P

Scripture references are from Modern King James (MKJV) unless noted otherwise.


Aim -

Is to produce a short useful piece of reference material based on the work by Mr. A. J. Ferris concerning his commentary on Daniel chapters 11.

Reason –

This booklet is out of print. In my opinion it is one of the few commentaries with considerable detail covering this particular prophecy. Hence it is worthy of revival.

 

Reference:

The Second Advent: How, When, Where? / A. J. Ferris. - Fourth Edition.;

And my HARD copy of the booklet


Background

The attached material has been copied from the above-mentioned booklet. Ferris initially produced his first edition in 1935, then later, the third edition in July 1940. The works of Ferris can be obtained from the National Library; you can search via “Trove”, “https://trove.nla.gov.au/”.

NB: PLEASE DON'T throw out the baby with the bath water! Take note that Ferris wrote this in the late 1930's, World War II era. People thought the, "END is NIE!" So, his prediction "the l9l7 generation will see the Second Advent", was obviously wrong! The rest of this booklet is from good hindsight analysis of history and scripture, and I believe it is excellent. It is a whole lot better than some people these days who predict this chapter is still ALL future. 

This chapter is one continuous event or vision. Cyrus and Darius the Mede are the same person, Refer to the works by James Ussher’s, ‘The Annals of the World’- “560 BC par 902”. So it is Gabriel who says in Dan 11:1 “I, in the first year of Darius the Mede, I was standing for a supporter and for a fortress for him.”

The symbols like [P57] indicate the exact location of the bottom of the booklet page. In some cases it happened to be mid sentence. Or [Map] indicate the exact location of the map or chart.

Ferris uses the Historic interpretation point of view, as did many of the orthodox Protestant commentators. Refer to ‘e-Sword’, History of The Christian Church, volume 1 chapter 12 par. 101. Or do a word search using the phrase “The Apocalypse is a prophetic”.


From “The Second Advent: How, When, Where? By A. J. Ferris. - Fourth Edition.

Starting page 57

****************************************************************************************************************

(5) The Fall of Turkey, the last “King of the North” of Dan 11, also shows that the l9l7 generation will see the Second Advent.

DANIEL, Chapter 11. 3. And a mighty king shall stand up. 4. ..and his kingdom shall be broken. 5. And the King of the South shall be strong ..and he (the King of the North) shall be strong above him. (verses 6 to 30) 31 ..And arms shall stand and they shall pollute the sanctuary, and shall take away the daily sacrifice (70 A.D,) and they shall place the abomination that makes desolate. 32 ..the people that do know their God shall do exploits and shall .. 33. Instruct many, yet they shall fall by the sword., and by flame, by captivity ..many days. 34 ..but many shall cleave to them with flatteries. (35) ..36. And the king shall ..exalt himself above every god, and shall speak marvellous things against the God of gods, and shall prosper till the indignation be accomplished. 37. Neither shall he regard the God of his fathers nor the desire of women.... 38. But in his estate shall he honour the God of forces: and a god whom his fathers knew not ..with gold, and silver, and  with precious stones.

DAN. 11 Is the consecutive history of the nations ruling the Near East from Alexander the Great to fall of Turkey in 1917- 18. The “mighty king” of DAN. 11-3 was Alexander the Great after whose death in 323 B.C. the Greek Empire was divided into two smaller Empires, one centred in SYRIA, north of Palestine, and the other in EGYPT, south of Palestine. Verses 6 to 30 then foretold the history of those two powers from 323 B.C. to 62 B.C., calling them by the names of the " King of the North " and the “King of the South. “Bishop Newton, the well-known writer on prophecy, stated that Daniel's forecast of the careers of those kings of Syria and Egypt” was really more perfect than any history." About 60 B.C. the Romans conquered the whole of the Near East, so that the " King of the North " and the " king of the South " ceased to exist until the fall of Imperial Rome when, as Daniel foretold, they rose again. [P57]

Verse 31 describes the rise of the Imperial Roman Empire; (“arms shall stand on his part"); and how that the Romans would destroy the Temple-as in70 A.D. (“they shall take away the daily sacrifice”) the same " abomination of desolation" referred to in Christ’s prophecy of the destruction of Jerusalem.

Verses 32, 33, then describe the preaching by the early Christians ("the people that do know their god shall do exploits ") and then their persecution under Pagan Rome (" yet they shall fall by the sword, and by flame and by captivity.")

Verse 34 then describes the cessation of that tribulation by the nominal conversion of the Roman Empire to Christianity under the leadership of the Emperor Constantine in 312 A.D. (" many shall cleave to them with flatteries.”) - Christianity became popular.

Verses 36 to 39 then describe apostate Christendom during the "'time of the end "under the head of the Papacy from 533 B.C." [My Comment Here - A Typo 'BC' should be AD?] ...till the indignation be accomplished' that is, until the end of the "seven times” chastisement of Israel. The Papacy certainly “(exalted himself above every god”, i.e., above all idols and rulers, nor did he " regard the desire of women," by laws of celibacy forbidding the marriage of its priesthood of both sexes, and confining multitudes to seclusive monastery life. Also “in his estate he honoured the God of forces”, or as literally rendered, “a God of protectors”, or divine guardians. Parallel with the rise of the Papacy into power, the Church of Rome encouraged the worship of the shrines, relics and images of dead saints who came to be regarded as intercessors and mediators to God. The Roman Catholic nations name their streets after their saints. Thousands of village churches and chapels in France, Belgium, Austria, etc., have their patron saints. The Roman Catholic peoples also hang medals of their saints around the necks of their cattle as lucky charms, and wear brooches of their saints to protect them from accidents, etc. Moreover the Papacy “honoured a god whom his fathers knew not, with gold, silver, and precious stones”. Some regard this as a reference to the [P58]  “Virgin Mary” images of whom were, and still are covered with priceless jewels. However the “Queen of Heaven” was well known to the Babylonians and idolatrous Israelites of old, (see Jer, 44:17 to 19,) so that this more likely refers to the worship of the “bread-god” the “host” or “mass” encased in the be-jewelled monstrance.

The fall of the Imperial Roman Empire also allowed the nations of the Near East to rise into power once again. As foretold in DAN. 7:2, “their lives were prolonged for a season and a time.” Thus Dan. 11:40 to 45, describe during the period of Papal dominion, the rise again of the two Gentile Empires corresponding to the Kings of the North and South of pre-Roman days. Verse 40 shows these two powers attacking in turn the dominions of apostate Christendom, and shows the “King of the North” being victorious over many countries of the former Imperial Roman Empire. Verse 40: -

and at that time  of  the end shall the King of the South push at HIM, and the King of the North shall come against HIM like a whirlwind. . . .

First of all notice in this verse that the “King of the North” does NOT fight against the “King of the South” as so many people wrongly read this verse. The “King of the South” attacks “HIM” -the Papal dynasty and the countries of idolatrous Christendom described in the previous verses 36 to 39. Then the “King of the North” follows on and also attacks “HIM” -the same countries, and apparently with far more permanent results.

It needs very little knowledge of European history to identify these two anti-Papal Eastern powers of the latter days. Sir Isaac Newton, one of history's greatest intellects, clearly showed in his “Observations Upon the Prophecies of Daniel”, 1733, that these two powers were the ARABS and the TURKS who successively attacked and conquered large portions of apostate Papal Christendom. Here is similar evidence from a later famous Bible student. Dr. Alexander Keith, who wrote on pages 141, 142 of his “Signs of the Times”, 1847: - [P59]

“The King of the South, and the King of the North, as denoting the successive sovereigns of Egypt and Syria, necessarily passed away, when these kingdoms were engrossed in the Roman Empire. But as their designation was derived from the local relation of their kingdoms to Judea, so also in the more recent things (i.e. in the latter days) the some names must be held to retain the same general significancy. And not only is it so in respect to the Saracenic and Turkish powers-that the one arose on the south, and the other on the north of Judea-but the Saracens actually became masters of Egypt, the original kingdom of the of the King of the South, and were the first to dispossess the Romans of that country, and long retained possession of it; while 'Syria, or the Kingdom of the North, was also a province of the Turkish Empire. And both, thought in a larger sense, have occupied the stations of the former and original kings. With the exception of them, there is none in all past history to whom the appellation of the Kings of the South and of the North, in reference to Judea, can, with any propriety, be adapted; while the Caliphs of the Saracens, and the Emperors of the Turks, have a clear as well as exclusive right to the name, and have sustained the characters, as they occupy the place, of the Kings of the North and of the South, during the period of the " time of the end," even as during that appointed time the Pope bore all the marks of the king, who did according to his will, and magnified himself above all,”

In regard to the "King of the South," in 622 A.D. Mohammed was proclaimed in Medina, Arabia, as the prince and prophet of Allah by the Arabs. In 629, he sallied forth from the SOUTH of Palestine at the head of a vast and victorious army. From 634 to 644 A.D., the Caliph Omar, a successor to Mohammed, conquered 36,000 cities or strongholds, destroyed 4,000 Christian churches and built 1.400 Mosques. By the year 638, A.D. the Mohammedans had conquered Palestine including Jerusalem, while Egypt fell in 640. Then the Saracen Empire gradually [P60] spread across Northern Africa and thence to Spain.

[P61 is Map]

The Arabs even sacked Rome the city of the Popes. In 876, Pope John resisted the Arabs at sea. By military conquest of all the countries which formed the extremities of the Papal dominions, the Mohammedan power thus “pushed at him”. Also the fact that this desolating power had its origin and capital in Arabia and Egypt directly SOUTH of Palestine, further proved that it was the latter-day “King of the South” of verse 40.

Towards the end of the 11th century A.D., a number of tribes of TURKS migrated up the valley of the Euphrates, and took up their abode in Baghdad. Damascus and Aleppo, i.e., in SYRIA. The Turks quickly adopted the Mohammedan faith and became a far worse scourge to idolatrous Christianity than the Arabs had been. As the Turkish Empire sprang from Syria -the very, centre of the “King of the North” of pre-Roman days-the Turks thus became the later day “King of the North” of. DAN. 11-40: -
. . . and the King of the North shall come against him like a whirlwind, with chariots, and with horsemen, and with many ships; and he shall enter into the countries and shall overflow and pass over”.

This verse exactly describes the career of the Turks from the 11th to the 16th century, A.D., when they became the greatest military power of Europe and Asia-the “terrible Turk”. Their one object was to destroy idolatrous Christianity according to the Koran of Mohammed, and this they did when they “entered into the countries” of Asia Minor and “overflowed and passed over” the Mediterranean Sea into Europe. In 1453 A.D. Constantinople which was the centre of Eastern Christendom, fell to the Turks.

The next, event Daniel described in time order was the conquest of the “glorious land” or Palestine. Verse 41: “He shall enter also into the glorious land, and many countries shall be overthrown: but these shall escape out of his hand, even Edom, and Moab, and the chief of the children of Ammon”. [P62]

The Crusaders' Tower at Ramleh, Palestine, still standing as a memorial of the Turkish-Papal wars.

In the original Greek, the word “countries” is missing having only been put in by our translators. Thus the verse should read as follows: - “He shall enter also into the glorious land, and many shall be overthrown,” That is, as a result of the invasion of Palestine by the King of the North, many would be overthrown. The historian Gibbon not only unconsciously confirms the accuracy of this. prophecy in regard to Turkey's conquest of Palestine, but also shows how as a result “many were overthrown” i.e. Gibbon's History, Vol. 10. Page 375 – “But the most interesting conquest of the Seljukian Turks was that of Jerusalem which soon became the theatre of nations.” We surely only have to mention the “CRUSADES” to show clearly the fulfilment of verse 41. The Turkish conquest of Palestine gave the Papacy a rallying battle-cry which aroused all his dominions [P63] to endeavour to wrest the Holy Land from the “infidel" Turk and to drive him back from Roman Catholic Europe. Truly " many were overthrown " and all in vain for Palestine finally passed into permanent possession of the Turks, and half Europe fell to the sway of the Crescent.

The only exceptions to the conquests of the Turks form Baghdad to Vienna were foretold in verse 40, i.e. "Edom, Moab and the chief of Ammon," on the east of Palestine. Owing to the scarcity of water and to the rugged nature of these countries by which they could be easily defended by the Bedouin Arabs, they were never conquered by the Turks. This fact can be confirmed in Turkish Histories. Thus the identity of Turkey as the latter-day "King of the North " of Daniel is confirmed by even the least detail.

Daniel then went on to describe in time order the Turks' conquest of the countries in North Africa, and actually named Egypt, Libya and Ethiopia as coming under Turkey's dominion, i.e. verses 42, 43:- “He shall stretch forth his hand also upon the countries: and the land of Egypt shall not escape. But he shall have power over the treasures of gold and of silver, and over all the precious things of Egypt: and the Libyans and the Ethiopians shall be at his steps.”

It is a fact of history that after Palestine the Turks conquered Egypt in '1517, and exactly as Daniel foretold they drained Egypt of all her wealth and left her the poverty-stricken nation she has since been. Not only did the Turks take over the taxes which the Egyptians had been accustomed to pay their rulers, but as Sir Paul Rycaut tells us in his authoritative “Turkish History” Vol. 1, Page 375: -

Above 500 families of the noblest and richest of the Egyptians were commanded to remove from Cairo to Constantinople in ships hired for the purpose. Into this fleet, besides the King's treasures and riches, he conveyed all the public and private ornaments of that most rich and famous city.” [P64]

In 1550, the Turks next conquered Libya - in strict agreement with Daniel's prophecy' As regards Ethiopia. Sit Paul Rycaut tells on the same page as quoted above. that after the Turkish conquest of Egypt and Libya, "all the princes who were before tributary or Confederate to the late Sultan of Egypt even to the Most mighty King of Ethiopia without delay entered into like subjection with the Turks." Thus the Ethiopians - were truly " at his steps" on the southern boundary of the Turkish Empire.

Thus Dan 11: 40 to 43 describes a vast Empire obtained by military conquest, stretching over Asia Minor, South-Eastern Europe, Palestine, Egypt, and North-African lands. This exactly was the composition -of the Ottoman Empire in the 16th, 17th and 18th centuries There could never have been written a more accurate description of the rise of the Turkish Empire in so few words as Daniel used in DAN 11:40 to 43. Nor has history recorded any other Empire which has fulfilled Daniel’s prophecy except Turkey.

DAN. 17:44-45, then foretold the cause of the collapse of the "King of the North" and that he would come to his end. " But tidings out of the EAST and out of the NORTH should trouble him: therefore he shall go forth with great fury to destroy, and utterly to make away many".

Trouble from the east and from the north of Turkey. would be from Russia as the latter is directly north-east of Turkey. (As there was no single word for " north-east " in Hebrew, the above method was the only way to indicate the direction of Russia). The “tiding" from Russia was the news of the repeated encroachment of Russia across Turkey's north-eastern boundaries (Russia’s ulterior motive being to capture Constantinople, the gate to the Black Sea). As a result of such an encroachment, Turkey sent army after army, and navy after navy against Russia “with great fury” and in every case met with disaster. For Example, in the Russian-Turkish War of 1768, the Turkish armies were beaten and disgraced.

In 1770, [P65] the Turkish fleet was annihilated by Russia in the Aegean Sea. In 1774, another Turkish army was completely beaten. In 1777, Russia again defeated Turkey on both sea and land. In 1806, Russia occupied Moldavia and Walachia, and the Turkish fleet was again destroyed by the Russian fleet. In 1826, Turkey surrendered to Russia all the fortresses it possessed in Asia. The war continued and resulted in the independence of Greece in 1829. Then in 1853 Turkey took the offensive against Russia and the Crimean War broke out. In 1867 Servia was made independent. Then in 1877-8, there took place the most disastrous war of all between Russia and Turkey as a result of which the countries forming modern Jugo-Slavia, Rumania and Bulgaria were severed from the Turkish Empire which thus lost the major portion of its European territory.

Verse 45 then foretold the complete end of the Turkish Empire: - “And he shall plant the tabernacles of his palace between the seas in the glorious holy mountain; yet he shall come to his end, and none shall help him.”

The glorious holy mountain between the seas is Mount Zion, between the Dead Sea and the Mediterranean. The translation " tabernacles of his palace,” as in the A.V., obscures the true meaning. On page 356 of his "Dissertations on the Prophecies” l754. Bishop Newton pointed out the correct interpretation (as also borne out by Elliot and other scholarly commentators), as follows: -

“...he shall plant the TENTS OF His Army, etc." What then are the facts of history? In the Great War, the Turks made their military headquarters in Jerusalem on Mount Zion, with the result that the once great Turkish Empire came to its final end by the loss of Palestine, Mesopotamia and Syria. In 1917-18, the Turks were driven out of Baghdad Damascus and Aleppo – the three capitals of the pre-Roman “Kings of the North”. Thence Turkey ceased to be the “King of the North,” which [P66] thus “came to his end”, and none helped him.

[P67 Map]

The Turks afterwards shifted their capital from Imperial Constantinople to Ankara in Asia Minor, which became a small cosmopolitan Republic.

Verses l to 3 of DAN. 12, tell us what will happen next. Dan 12: 1 "And at that time shall Michael stand up, the great prince which standeth for the children of thy people (and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation even to that same time:) And at that time thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book. :2 And many of them that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt."

Therefore the next great events before us are (A) the activity of Michael the archangel, (B) a great national deliverance of the peoples of Israel and Judah, and (C) the first resurrection. We recognize these three events as all being associated with the second coming of Christ. As regards Michael, we saw in 1 THESS., 4-16, that when the Lord Jesus descends from heaven, the voice of the archangel will ring out at the head of the angelic hosts. As regards the national deliverance of Israel, God has promised to destroy the German attack on Britain, and also the Russian attack on Palestine, and many scriptures show that all in Israel who at this time call upon the name of the Lord will be saved from destruction. Thirdly, we know that at Christ's advent, there will take place the first resurrection. Therefore, as the last “King of the north,” Turkey, came to his end in 1917-18, these next events as shown to Daniel cannot be far off in our, experience.

*For the fulfilment of this prophecy, see “The Great Tribulation, Past, Present or Future?” by A. J. Ferris. [P68]

(6) Daniel's Time-periods of the Mohammedan Desolation also point to the l9l7 generation as the end of the age.

In the remaining verses of Dan 12 the prophet inquires of God what would be the absolute end of the wonders he had been told about in the previous visions, DAN. 2 etc. He is then told the exact length of time the Mohammedan desolation would last and that at its end, the resurrection would take place which means of course the second advent of Christ. Let us now study the dates provided in DAN. 12, which will thus give us a very approximate idea as to when to expect the advent of Christ. 

As recorded in the last part of Dan 12, Daniel had a vision in which he saw a river on each bank of which stood an angel; the angel who had been telling Daniel about the “King of the North”, etc., apparently stood in the centre of the river. Verse 5: - "Then I Daniel looked, and behold, there stood other two (angels), the one on this side of the. Bank of the river, and the other on that side of the bank." 

Daniel then heard one of the angels call from the bank to the angel in the centre of the river, "How long shall it be to the end of these wonders?" The “wonders" were the prophetic visions give to Daniel as recorded in Dan. 2, etc. These can be divided into two groups (A) those including the career of the pre-Roman Kings of the South and North, i.e., Egypt and Syria, and (B), those including the latter-day, Kings of the South and North, i.e. the Arab and Turkish Empires. And so Daniel heard the answer: -

 “And I heard the man clothed in linen, which was upon the waters of the river, when he held up his RIGHT HAND and his LEFT HAND unto heaven, and sware by Him that liveth for ever that IT (each group of wonders) SHALL BE FOR A TIME, TIMES, AND AN HALF; and when He (God) shall have accomplished to scatter the power of the holy people, all these things shall be finished.” [P69]

We notice that the angel raised TWO hands instead of the usual one hand in making an oath, this indicating that his oath referred to the TWO groups of "wonders" in DANIEL. Each group would last for: “3½ times” which meant that the whole of DANIEL would take "seven times” or 2520 years to be fulfilled. We recognize this period as the very length of time God foretold He would chastise and scatter His people Israel and Judah Lev. 26: 32: - “if ye will not hearken unto me, I will chastise you seven times for your sins. …I will SCATTER you among the nations.”

MY comment here: - "Lev. 26: 32"?? Maybe a misquote of scripture reference? But what he is quoting IS refereeing to the following: -

Lev 26:14 “But if ye will not hearken unto me, and will not do all these commandments;..:18 And if ye will not yet for all this hearken unto me, then I will punish you seven times more for your sins. …:21 And if ye walk contrary unto me, and will not hearken unto me; I will bring seven times more plagues upon you according to your sins. …:24 Then will I also walk contrary unto you, and will punish you yet seven times for your sins. …:28 Then I will walk contrary unto you also in fury; and I, even I, will chastise you seven times for your sins. …:33 “And I will scatter you among the heathen, and will draw out a sword after you: and your land shall be desolate, and your cities waste.” 

Hence it seems as if the wonders of DANIEL were to be fulfilled during the captivity of God's people. This is confirmed by the remainder of the angel's answer that “when He shall have accomplished to scatter the power of the holy people" (or as the Septuagint puts it, “when the dispersion is ended,”) then “ALL THESE THINGS SHALL BE FINISHED.,, Thus the prophecies of DANIEL were to be fulfilled during the “seven times” dispersion of Israel and Judah, and to terminate at the same time as the dispersion ended. The historical interpretation of DAN. 11 as fulfilled in the Papacy, the Arab and Turkish Empires, etc. fits in perfectly with this answer of the angel. Daniel of course could not understand these Prophecies, (as we can now), and so he exclaimed in verse 8: - "I heard, but I understood not …O my Lord, what shall be the END of these wonders?" The prophet was then told to go on his way for the wonders were "sealed till the TIME OF THE END," when many saints would be persecuted at the hands of the wicked. Then and only then would the prophecies of Daniel be understood.

Verse 9-10: - “And he said, Go thy way, Daniel: for the words are closed up and sealed till the time of the end. Many shall be purified, and made white, and tried; but the wicked shall do wickedly: and none of the wicked shall understand; but the wise shall understand.” Truly during the “time of the end” the Papacy [P70] persecuted unto death millions of true Christians. At the same time the martyrs came to understand Daniel’s prophecies which were unsealed by their fulfilment. by its blasphemous pretentions the Papacy revealed itself as the self-deifying power of Dan. 11: 36-39, while the war of the Arab and Turkish Empires against the Papacy revealed then as the later-day ‘Kings of the South and North”

The Book of Revelation is the continuation of Daniel 's visions. Now we read in REV. 22: l0, "SEAL NOT the sayings of the prophecy of  this book: FOR THE TIME IS AT HAND." This means that in 90 A.D., the "time of the end" had commenced, when the books or DANIEI and REVELATION would be unsealed. Truly many of the Lord's people were purified in the fires of Pagan and Papal precaution, and came to understand the meaning of DANIEL and REVELATION as the prophecies were progressively. fulfilled throughout the "time of the end” or the "last time" or "last days".

As regards Daniel himself, his fervent request was not altogether in vain, for the angel of the Lord went on to tell him how long it would be to the end of the second group of wonders. Verse 11:- "And from the time that the daily shall be taken away, and an Abomination THAT MAKETH DESOLATE BE SET UP, there shall be 1290 days, (to its end)." Thus the desolating power of Mohammedanism which the angel sware would last ‘3½ times’, or 1260 “days" would pass away during the next 3O “days” Daniel was then told a most amazing promise that those of his people Israel and Judah alive to see the 1335 “days" of the Mohammedan faith would be blessed, and what was more, at the end of those 1335 “days” the resurrection would take place (as already explained in the first few verses of.'' DAN. 12) and Daniel himself would be resurrected Verse 13: -

"Blessed is he that cometh to the 1335 days. But go thy way till the end be: for thou shalt rest, (i.e.. sleep in death) and stand (be resurrected) in thy lot at the end of those days." [P71]

 According to these figures, 1335 prophetical days from the time the Mohammedan power arose ought to bring us to the time of the first resurrection which is of course the second advent of Christ as Paul taught the Thessalonian church.

(Note: - All the prophetical "days" in DAN. and Rev. are equal to YEARS in the calendars of the nations concerned. In regard to the Papacy, we saw that "3 ½   times" or 1260 prophetical "days" were equal to 1260 Solar years because the Latin earth uses the Christian calendar of solar years. But the prophecies of DAN. 11, as above, refer to the Near East, and to Mohammedanism. Now the Mohammedan year consists of. 12 revolutions of the moon around the earth which equal 354 days. This is called a LUNAR year. Then the "3½ times" or 1260 prophetical days of Mohammedanism will be equal to 1260 LUNAR years, on the scale of a year for a prophetical "day". The 1290 "days" will be equal 1290 L. years, and likewise the 1335 "days.")

Let us now test out these time-periods given to Daniel and see whether the power of Mohammedanism did desolate Christendom for 126O L. years, and whether it came to its end after 1290 L. years, and whether Daniel's people have been blessed after 1335 L. years. Then we ought to be able to tell how near or otherwise we are to the first resurrection. A chart is here enclosed for reference showing the dates of the rise of anti-Papal Mohammedanism and the dates which were 1260, 1290 and 1335 L. years later. In the year 622 A.D., Mohammed was publicly proclaimed at Medina as the prophet of God and commenced gathering his followers. In 629, he led his army from Mecca to conquer Arabia In 637, his successor the Caliph Omar attacked Palestine, and early in 638 entered Jerusalem. Gibbon tells us in his history Vol. 9, p. 413, how at that time the Christian patriarch of Jerusalem testified that the abomination of desolation (of DAN. 12-11) is in the holy place." In 643, on the very site of Solomon's Temple, Omar commenced building a [P72]

[P73 Chart]

mosque which became a physical symbol of the Mohammedan desolation of Eastern Christendom. By 644, the Saracen Empire had become firmly established over the Near East, and in that year the great Othman became Caliph and the mightiest in history. Thus the years 622 to 644 A.D. were the commencing dates of the rise of Mohammedanism and we should expect to see corresponding periods of decline at the end of the 1260 and 1290 L. years. On the chart it will be seen that these two periods ran out in the years 1844 to 1895 A.D., and in absolute confirmation of the accuracy of our interpretation, in those very years the great Mohammedan Turkish Empire came to its end. Now let us test the detailed dates.

As we come down 1260 L. years from 622-644 A.D., we reach the years 1844-1866 which should have seen the cessation of Mohammedanism as an active desolating power. In the very year 1260 of Mohammed which was the Christian year 1844., Britain demanded of Turkey that she cease the practice of putting to death Mohammedans who became Christians. Although this meant an alteration in the very laws of the Koran, the Mohammedan Bible, pressure from Britain forced the Sultan to issue a "Decree of Religious Toleration," by which Christians were allowed to live within the Turkish Empire. In the succeeding years the Turkish Empire experienced rebellion and revolution throughout all its states as well as war with Russia. In 1853, the Czar of Russia, the Emperor Nicholas, gave testimony as to the end of Turkey as a great power in his memorable words to Sir Hamilton Seymour the British ambassador in St. Petersburg, "We have on our hands a sick man – a very sick man, and he may suddenly die on our hands.”

Then as we come down a further 30 years, that Is 1290 L. years all told from the era of the rise of Mohammedanism, we reach the years 1873 to 1895, which should have seen the end of the Turkish Empire. In 1874 the Turkish states of Herzegovina, Bosnia, Montenegro and Bulgaria all rebelled in open war [P74] against the Sultan.

[Map Top of P75]

Then in 1877-8, there took place the great war between Russia and Turkey as a result of which the peoples of modern  Jugo-Slavia, Rumania and Bulgaria broke away from the Turkish Empire. In 1882, Britain defeated the Mohammedan Egyptians by which Egypt passed into British hands. Then through the efforts of General Gordon in 1884, and Lord Kitchener in 1896, the Mohammedan followers of the Madhi were defeated, and the Sudan became British. Thus the Turkish Empire came to its end as a great power. Then as we come down a further 45 L. years, that is 1335 L. .years all told from the era of the rise of Mohammedanism, we come to the years 1917 to 1939, which should have seen (1) the final end of the Turkish Empire, (2) God's blessing on His peoples Israel and Judah, and ( 3) the way made open for the first [P75] resurrection. The Mohammedan year 1335 commenced on October 28th, 1916 and terminated October.16th, 1917. On page 77 there will be seen a drawing of an Egyptian coin which was minted in 1917. As Egypt was then a Protectorate of Britain, the Christian Year 1917 is shown in English figures. Also as Egypt was largely Mohammedan in faith, the coin shows the corresponding year of Mohammed -1335, in Arabic figures.

[Map from P77]

On January 9th, 1917, British troops invaded Palestine by capturing the border town of Rafa, and from then onward  the Turks were driven back. Two months later, in March, British troops also entered Baghdad  in Mesopotamia. Then on November 2nd 1917, Lord Balfour made the historic "Balfour Declaration," announcing that Britain would give her support to 'making a national home for the Jews in Palestine! Thus right to the year what a blessed hope swept through Jewry, and the hope has since materialized. Then on November 9th, the Turks lost Gaza followed a week later by the loss of Jaffa. Then came the crowning victory of all, the DELIVERANCE' OF Jerusalem. On December 9th, 1917, through fear of being surrounded and cut off, the Turks evacuated Jerusalem without the necessity of a single shot being fired into the Holy City, and on December 11th, General Allenby made his official entry in the name of Christian Britain. Then in September, 1918, came the great drive in which the Turks were driven completely out of Palestine and thousands taken prisoner. By October 1st, 1918, Damascus was captured, and on October 26th, British troops entered Aleppo. Five days later, on October 31st, Turkey unconditionally surrendered. Thus in the exact year commencing the period of prophesied blessing for God’s people, the armies of the British Empire as Modern Ephraim-Israel the birthright tribe, came into possession of Palestine, and the way was made open for the return of the Jews.

Moreover, wonderful to relate, on January 31st, 1977, right in the year 1335 of Mohammed, [P76] then [Map of P77] the Turkish Government abandoned using Mohammedan calendar and adopted instead the Christian calendar! Here is "THE TIMES” report of this most significant event.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

THE TIMES, WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 31, 1917. Imperial and Foreign News Items.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Turkish Chamber of Deputies has sanctioned the adoption of the Gregorian calendar.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

What else but the Hand of God caused Turkey to finish with the Mohammedan calendar as soon as their year 1335 was reached? To those who had  “eyes to see" it was an obvious demonstration by God that Daniel's 1335th year of blessing had been reached. Also what further need was there for the Mohammedan calendar. God's over-ruling of the Turkish mode of reckoning in favour of the Christian was a symbolic dramatization that the “times of the Gentiles" were at their end and the end of the age was nigh.

Then in 1923 the League of Nations granted Britain the Mandate to govern Palestine, while in 1924, the Turkish Republic expelled her religious head the Caliph and abandoned Mohammedanism as her official Religion, exactly 1335 L. years from the time Mohammed her first Caliph went forth to victory. Then in 1925 came the record return of some 38,000 Jews to Palestine. As we come down 1335 L. years from the time the Mohammedans under Omar conquered Palestine and Egypt, 638 to 640 A.D., we reach the years 1933 to 1935, which saw the remarkable return of some 136,000 Jewish immigrants to Palestine. As we come down 1335 L. years from the years 642 to 644 A.D., when the Mosque of Omar was built and the Saracen Empire established over the Near East, we reach the years 1937 to 1939. In 1937, owing to the Jewish influx into Palestine, the Palestine Mohammedans broke the peace of the land. As a result Britain expelled their leaders including their [P78] head the Grand Mufti, in spite of his sheltering in the Mosque of Omar!


[Photo Top P79]

Then in October 1937, an earthquake shook the Mosque of Omar as a result of which the experts appointed by Britain reported on April 11th, 1938, that the Mosque was "in a dangerous condition and needs immediate repair” surely symbolizing the death-knell of this last relic of the Mohammedan desolation. Also 1937 and 1938 witnessed the activities of the Royal Commission, whose suggestions caused the League of Nations to agree to Britain having permanent government of the three holy cities, of Jerusalem, Bethlehem and Nazareth. Then in 1939-40 came the disastrous earthquakes in Turkey with the loss of 60,000 lives and widespread damage.

Thus true to Daniel’s promise, the 1335th year of Mohammedanism has brought the final end of the Turkish Empire, the blessing to Britain-Israel of having the dominion of Palestine and Jerusalem, while the family of Judah are, escaping from their persecution in Europe to Anglo-Saxon lands, and in part [P79] to Palestine. Finally, Daniel was told that he would be resurrected at the end of the 1335 years. The events of 1917 and since have confirmed that we have reached the end of the 1335 years of Mohammedanism. Therefore we must be very close indeed to the time of the first resurrection and the second advent of Christ. Readers can judge this for themselves.

Here are the facts which none can gainsay. In conclusion listen to what that great Bible scholar, Dr. Grattan Guinness, wrote over 60 years ago in his “Approaching End of the Age”, pages 473 474. as follows: -

THE DESTRUCTION OF THE OTTOMAN Empire ..SHOULD BE A Trumpet BLAST TO Christendom, Proclaiming THAT THE DAY OF CHRIST IS AT HAND. When the Moslems, now driven out of Bulgaria, shall be driven also out of Syria, When the nations of Europe shall conspire to reinstate the Jews in the land of their forefathers, THEN the last warning bell will have rung, then the second advent will be CLOSE at hand.

Dr. Guinness was able to make such a prophecy because the Bible showed the destruction of the Turkish Empire, and the return of the Jews, as signs of the immediate return of Christ. We who now live in 1940 have seen the destruction of Turkey. We have seen the Moslems driven out of Syria in 1918. We have seen the League of Nations "conspire to reinstate the Jews" by entrusting the Mandate of Palestine to Britain for the purpose of repatriating the Jews. We have witnessed the Jewish population increase by 500,000 since 1918. Therefore if the above great Bible student was alive to-day he would say that "the hast warning bell HAS rung - the second advent IS at hand," and we must agree. [P80]

********************************************

(Notes: -The late Italian-Abyssinian War tempted many Bible students to try and fit the event of Dan. 11: 40-45 into the present and near future. For example, some think that Italy is the "King of the South" of verse 40. But Italy can never be either a "King of the South" or a "King of the North" because she is the heart of the former Roman Empire, NOT the Greek, and also is WEST of Palestine rather than north or south. Others consider that Italy is the latter-day "King of the North", but if so she has gone about her conquests in exactly the opposite order described by DAN. 77. Daniel's "King of the North" was to build up its Empire by conquering (1) "many countries," (2) then "the glorious land" or Palestine, (3) then Egypt, (4) then Libya and Ethiopia: whereas Italy has conquered Libya and Ethiopia first! This shows the futility of trying to apply DAN. 11 to the present day, for DAN. 11 is historically fulfilled in every minute detail. Then some think that Britain is that “King of the South", But the “King of the South" of pre-Roman days was always the southern half of the GREEK Empire, and was an heathen Gentile power. The heart of Britain is NORTHWEST of Palestine, not south, nor can she be classified as a Gentile power since she contains more spiritual children of Abraham than any other race, quite apart from her Bible identity, as latter-day Ephraim-Israel.

Also there are some who think that Russia is the "King of the North" of verses 40 to 45 in view of the fact that Ezekiel describes at the end of the age an invasion of Palestine by Russia, etc.. from the NORTH. Russia is certainly north of Palestine, but TOO FAR north to qualify since the centre of the dominions of Daniel's pre-Roman "King of the North" was always SYRIA. Russia has never even occupied Syria so that once and for all rules her out.

Also the "King of the North" was to have "many ships" (verse 40); there is no evidence that Russia has any considerable fleet whatever to-day, nor does she need ships to invade the Near East. On the other hand, the Turks had great fleets by which they were able to “overflow and pass over" the seas from Asia Minor into Europe. The Turks also conquered all the islands in the Aegean Sea. (Gibbon relates in his [P8l] History, Vol. 5, p. 553, how that at one time the Turks Caused a fleet of 200 ships to be constructed by their captive Greeks)

Again some think that Russia is Daniel's "King of the North" because the Authorized Version of EZEK. 38: 5 states that “ETHIOPIA and LIBYA" Will be with Russia. But Ezekiel plainly shows that all these countries who will be in league with Russia, will come down “OUT OF THE NORTH PARTS" And “from THE NORTH QUARIERS" (V. 6). Therefore these cannot be the modern African Ethiopia and Libya since the latter are SOUTH and West of Palestine. The descendants of "Kush and Phut" Translated "Ethiopia and Libya" in the A.V.), divided into two, one section migrating into Asia and the other into Africa. Obviously, it is the Asiatic section which will be with Russia, probably the modern Afghanistan with its Hindu-KUSH.

This Russian league will certainly invade Palestine but will not conquer and build up the vast Near Eastern Empire which Daniel described for the "King of the North" of verses 40 to 45. As there can be only a year or two left of the period known as the “times of the Gentiles", it is now absolutely impossible for any Gentile power to carry out the long and mighty exploits pictured in Dan. 11: 40 to 45. It must be remembered that Daniel prophesied concerning events which cover 2520 years in their fulfilment, and which were to be fulfilled during the "scattering of the holy people" (Israel and Judah). Anglo-Saxon Israel is now gathered out of the Continent, and since 1918 hundreds of thousands of Judah have migrated into Israel and back to Palestine, thus proving that the dispersion is ended. Hence all attempts to apply the prophecies of Dan. 11: 40 to 45, to the present and near future will prove to be contradictory speculation which will lead nowhere, and only confuse people, and lead to unbelief by their non-fulfilment'  [P82]

I hope you found that as informative as did I

 

GBY, (God Bless Ya!) 

Yours Adrian Deacon

Here are some of my other talks that you might find interesting: -

Rebuilding The Temple Of Jerusalem

The Charge At Beersheba 1917

The Day For A Year Conundrum

Make America Great Again

The One World Government